Oh, that's what you were doing. That wasn't clear to me, didn't know you wanted me to use the debate channel. Admittedly, probably should've, but only saw my ability to post in the Townsquare was prohibited, and didn't check to see if it was active in Debate Hell.
Either way, I did clearly state that genetic engineering had downsides, and that the CRISPR thing was bad and shouldn't have been listened to, and that genetic engineering babies does not necessitate doing work into horse pox.
I also mentioned how the article specifically had a pro-Genetic Engineering dude who was a critic of CRISPR, showing that there is indeed a difference between the science and one scientist.