Player Comments on Lost in the Woods

Ridiculously short and I randomly died from turning east instead of west. If there's no reason behind a choice leading to a death then what's the point in thinking about any of the choices? I might as well just randomly click through. Barely a game, though some of your writing has potential. 2/8

Do not play this game it is terrible..

.. The troll was that person who's on Food Network. When I saw that picture I burst out laughing.

I thought that this game was very short, and there was some grammatical errors. It wasn't survival-like.

It doesn't have a lot of choices, nothing you can do realy changes anything, it's go the right way and live, go the wrong way and die, saving the co-pilot does NOTHING what is this? Your main character can do like one or rarely two choices, and it mentions choices in the story that ARE NOT THEIR. Sorry, but I rated it a two.

Great

Very linear story, I think there was only about one way to get a game over. Also, one of the links didn't work. It could definitely be improved with more choices and more description.

This was a bit...meh. The exploration was good up to a point, the spelling/grammar could certainly be improved, and it seemed very simple. Several parts didn't make any sense (why is there a troll?) so it seemed more like a parody than anything. It was alright.

This was a well written, very short piece of work. The grammar was almost perfect, though 'bic' should really be BIC or Bic, and kamel should be capitalised. You can clearly write, and some parts were pretty funny. However, there wasn't really much to the story. It could have been a lot better with more plot, character, and location development. There was only really one choice that mattered and that was a 50/50 chance of dying. This kind of thing could work if you'd left some clues as to which way to go.

Well, this isn't really a survival-ish game..?
Most of the time you're just clicking on the only choice, and to get out of the woods you'll have to pick west/east. One leads you to town and the other just makes you die of starvation.
I think you could introduce more weird (and funny! I kind of liked the cheese thing of truth part :) ) creatures and objects and make it some kind of wacky, silly survival game.
(I know you probably won't ever read this since your last login was like, 2 years ago, but if by any chance you check this out on time, you may be able to enter this for the January contest (assuming you try to make it better))

So short, and very morrow-minded choices, not much you can do, and so many of the choices lead inevetably to death BAD GAME. Only a two, I was expecting more, and I liked the concept... but it didn't turn out the way I was hoping.

This storygame (both story and game aspects) could be worked on. It's very basic, and the co-pilot isn't mentioned again.

For plane-crash-into-<insert place> games, this is not very good. There should be more options and paths, especially if it's a game where you want to find a way to survive and leave.

Truth! Philadelphia is proud of you.

It was a little too short, maybe you could make it longer next time.

Great. All I could think of throughout the rest of the story was making a Cheese Steak Of Truth. :/

Cheese Steak of Truth...

It wuss good

This is an entertaining game, but when I was dying of hunger all I could think of was how delicious that cheese steak of truth looked.

Sould be more then just one sentence for every choice needs a lot of work

Nice

Such a pity that the cheese steak of truth so closely resembles the beef cheddar bap of dishonesty. It's very confusing :(

Guy Fieri does not approve.