Forums » Feature Wishing Well » Read Thread

These game serve no purpose and I think we'd be better off without them

the family is GREAT GREAT GREAT

march

i dont like this feature either. and not just for the above mentioned arguments. thanks guys!! lol

my argument is simple. if person A makes a game and then person B (who is someone like Jamesmetallicany or whatever his name is) gets to the game first they can rate it a 1 and the game would disappear. not cool. maybe the game could be put on probation or something though. where people could vote to keep the game on the site. each vote could give that person (the voter) a MAG point. just a thought. i think this is a thought out request but it has too many loop holes as is.

nate

Council Ideas?

Me (Why Not)
March (Duh)
JJJ (Fair and Honost)
Nate (Average and has different ideas then the top 3)

Those 4 listed above are all diferent in personallity and judgeing skill.

3 of the 4 judges listed above would have to win to veto a game off the list.

So, what do you all think?

I disagree.  It should be

March, Myself, Solostrike, Havacoman and Chocobot. 3/5 should veto a game with a player rating 4- and 4/5 to veto a game 5+

i think you should know the answer to that one already havy lol. besides, i never supported the council idea anyway. i feel it should be up to the whole site to decide whats best for the site. not just 4-5 people judging for everyone.

nate