I know we always used to get annoyed at the WC kids for regurgitating the same plot over and over with no respect for the source material they were supposedly such fans of, but so much of that was because of how truly dire and effortless their actual stories were as well.
What I'm wondering now is, actual quality of the writing aside, is there a point where a fanfiction is so lacking in original anything that it should be disallowed as borderline plagiarism? Or is it always acceptable as long as credit is given?
What brought this to mind is a demo that was posted recently (not actually tagged as fanfiction though the title made it obvious) that apparently just walked through the opening of a video game step by step, using the exact dialogue, the author presumably with plans to make the finished product cover the rest of the game.
It seems to have been reasonably well accepted despite most readers obviously being familiar with the source material and it being a demo. So are games that are essentially walkthroughs of other games acceptable? I'm leery of this because it seems like a kind of slippery slope deal and I'd hate to see the site flooded with this kind of thing over original work, but at the same time I could think of a couple of classic games it might be fun to give that treatment to. Or what about borrowing from other media such as movies or using passages from actual books?