7/30/2024

3/17/2026 12:15 PM

1405

1

1511 wins / 1485 losses

Marauder

Gay and Depressed in Prison

3rd place entry in Corgi's Gaybellion Contest

In this game, you play a very familiar character from the previous Gay and Depressed stories, who is now in jail. You used to be a side character in other people's stories, but now the spotlight is finally yours in this Gay and Depressed spin-off!

If you're interested in some more Gay and Depressed story games, check out the original by queenlatifah04, Gay Old Time by Darius_Conwright, Gay and DepressedER!!! by fresh_out_of_the_oven, and Gay and Depressed: The snow bunny society by Benholman44. All of the "gay and depressed" stories are stand-alone stories, so each one can be read separately, but I highly recommend you check these stories out!

Junkyard Bay Blues

unpublished

My entry for Mizal's 1 day contest that took place on 2/22/2026.

Honestly, your stories fit the bill. I particularly loved "The Penguin without feet" and it would be a fun movie to watch. I'm actually signed up to review "Where the clouds want to go" and I'm loving it so far, although I haven't finished all the branches. Here's a list of a few games I've enjoyed that fit your criteria: When the music's over is a classic fantasy adventure with a lot of branching, page counts that are on average 300-500 words, and doesn't really use overly complex vocabulary for the most part. Geek is a really awesome horror game by Endmaster that I really loved but I don't see recommended all that often. The style is simple, and it's easy to read, although the maturity rating is an 8/8, so proceed with caution. But it's basically a faction story set in a rowdy carnival that's about to self-implode in civil war, and you as the Geek, the most pathetic member of the carnival, must plot and scheme in order to manipulate people into joining sides in the faction war, thereby assuring your side's victory. It's a lot of fun, the humor is raunchy but hits, and many of the branches proceed in really unexpected directions. The Butter Bear by pugpup1. The man has a gift for words, and after reading Father Leofwine is Dead and the butter bear, I'm disappointed that he hasn't written more. Father Leofwine is Dead is my favorite of the 2, but it uses some pretty gnarly text walls, so Butter Bear is the best bet for your criteria. It's a really wholesome story about this bear who loves butter and he and this little girl go on these fantastic adventures to accountant pigs, and a bunch of other cool animals I can't remember off the top of my head right now. Check out any of these, and let me know if the recs are good! Also, keep writing, your stories are awesome, and you have a great gift for writing wholesome stories that are really good!

That's wonderful! The idea of an origami heart is really cute and I love how your whole class got together to deliver the heart to him. It's good to see that writing a love letter will never go out of style. It's a classic for a reason

lol. Based reference. It's crazy that those books came out 20 years ago

I think Malk's point was more pertinent to banter and talking without filters as opposed to sending sexually explicit content and images. I don't think that falls into the category that Malk was talking about when he was explaining the difference between real life and forum behavior. His point was that saying "lol, fag" in real life is a faux pax and would make you look like an asshole, while saying it on CYS would be no issue since people would know that you are referring to a meme. But sending a picture of used cum rags or a naked woman doesn't apply here in that case. That's still creepy regardless.

I think the issue is not "is rape bad". That's obvious and that's a given. The issue that we disagree with you about is what constitutes as rape, and you don't seem to get that pressure, repeatedly asking, confusion tactics, scaling up gradually by saying "let's do this, let's do that" and before she knows it, you've completely bypassed her stated boundaries, and not taking soft nos for an answer. You only see "No! Get away from me creep!" and physically pushing you away as a clear rejection and a sign that you need to stop, but even a softer no, maybe her trying to reach for her phone, telling you that she has to meet with a friend, or even smiling in an uncomfortable way and just trying to go along with whatever you say until she can get to a safe place are all signs. But no script or manual can tell you this, only life experience will help, so guys who follow your advice will say, "but that particular sign wasn't in Cel's manual", or "She didn't do any of those things!" when she did but you just didn't notice. Cel, do you have platonic female friends? Like, women in your life you're not romantically involved with, who you're not trying to exploit or get anything out of? If so, talk to them. Hear their experiences with an open mind. Understand what they think is creepy might be different from what you think is creepy. Center women's experiences and try and see how many precautions they take and the way they have to literally shape their lives when they go out to avoid dangerous men. Women aren't off the clock, and at any time, there's always a baseline level of danger that comes with being a woman.

Cel, the encounter you described here is a clear cut case of sexual assault. You should have just waited at least 6 months like she originally wanted you to, stopped the moment she was even a little bit uncomfortable, and not have done any of the emotional manipulation described here.

It sounds like you're genuinely trying to help a lot of guys by telling them to go to the gym, but the dating stuff is really messed up. And you're creating harm for women because I think that a system where you have to prepare protocols to engage women is flawed and that it's better instead to get to know someone and socialize in a more wholesome way. Going into any encounter with an end goal in mind is going to put someone in the position where they overlook "no"s and signs of discomfort, and that's where you have to back off, right from the first rejection because that's being polite and it's the right thing to do. And for the line "if she's down for everything", then there's no issue about consent. She never said no to begin with. But I'm talking about the scenarios where she wasn't okay with what was happening, said no(in both cases of "nooooo" and "no!"), and you advised to back off and try again. I think just back off and leave her alone is the right answer 100 percent of the time.

"Guys will touch a girl, get a seemingly negative response (non-verbal "no"), then get all wimpy and give up. They think the game is over, but the game is just getting started." Yes, that's when you stop. And it's not wimpy to stop here, it's good manners.

Ok, I looked at the pictures more closely, and I will give you that there's good advice in there(going to the gym, respecting people, respecting yourself, etc...). But the major issue I have is with the screenshots posted by Mystic and where you start being called an incel because you're assuming things about women that real life women(Mystic) have told you is not true in their experience. I also think that this line, "As the man in the relationship, you need to be "at fault" for sex, and you need to lead her to it. If the girl was down for everything immediately but you stopped at just a kiss, she will be disappointed, and you'll be a sucker." is problematic, because even if the next line says "escalating until you receive pushback, then back off and **show her you understand her limits**.", you're still assuming that girls will be disappointed if you stop because she said no. She won't be disappointed and you won't be a sucker because the encounter should be over the moment either one of the parties does not wish to continue. Sure, rejection sucks but this way, you're respecting the woman's consent in the matter and you're halting the moment she says no. I don't think the "man" in the relationship needs to be "at fault for sex", and the way that you phrase it is reminiscent of incel/alpha male line of thought, which is why we're saying that you're teaching incel and incel-adjacent ideologies. I think both parties should proceed together at a pace they're comfortable with, and you don't need to assume that women don't want to have sex until you persuade them otherwise using the system outline above. That kind of thinking is what I have an issue with. And referring to women as "mid", "uggos", and "fatties" is rude and demeaning, not to mention sexist.

My bad, I didn't look through the actual pictures. That's a fair point. I think my main thing is, why game the system at all. Like, won't it be stressful to remember 50 different things, and try to approach women like an algorithm? And I guess, why have levels for "nos"? Why not just take the first no and then abort mission, not go for a second attempt?