7/30/2024

3/16/2026 12:45 PM

1400

1

1511 wins / 1485 losses

Marauder

Gay and Depressed in Prison

3rd place entry in Corgi's Gaybellion Contest

In this game, you play a very familiar character from the previous Gay and Depressed stories, who is now in jail. You used to be a side character in other people's stories, but now the spotlight is finally yours in this Gay and Depressed spin-off!

If you're interested in some more Gay and Depressed story games, check out the original by queenlatifah04, Gay Old Time by Darius_Conwright, Gay and DepressedER!!! by fresh_out_of_the_oven, and Gay and Depressed: The snow bunny society by Benholman44. All of the "gay and depressed" stories are stand-alone stories, so each one can be read separately, but I highly recommend you check these stories out!

Junkyard Bay Blues

unpublished

My entry for Mizal's 1 day contest that took place on 2/22/2026.

Cel, the encounter you described here is a clear cut case of sexual assault. You should have just waited at least 6 months like she originally wanted you to, stopped the moment she was even a little bit uncomfortable, and not have done any of the emotional manipulation described here.

It sounds like you're genuinely trying to help a lot of guys by telling them to go to the gym, but the dating stuff is really messed up. And you're creating harm for women because I think that a system where you have to prepare protocols to engage women is flawed and that it's better instead to get to know someone and socialize in a more wholesome way. Going into any encounter with an end goal in mind is going to put someone in the position where they overlook "no"s and signs of discomfort, and that's where you have to back off, right from the first rejection because that's being polite and it's the right thing to do. And for the line "if she's down for everything", then there's no issue about consent. She never said no to begin with. But I'm talking about the scenarios where she wasn't okay with what was happening, said no(in both cases of "nooooo" and "no!"), and you advised to back off and try again. I think just back off and leave her alone is the right answer 100 percent of the time.

"Guys will touch a girl, get a seemingly negative response (non-verbal "no"), then get all wimpy and give up. They think the game is over, but the game is just getting started." Yes, that's when you stop. And it's not wimpy to stop here, it's good manners.

Ok, I looked at the pictures more closely, and I will give you that there's good advice in there(going to the gym, respecting people, respecting yourself, etc...). But the major issue I have is with the screenshots posted by Mystic and where you start being called an incel because you're assuming things about women that real life women(Mystic) have told you is not true in their experience. I also think that this line, "As the man in the relationship, you need to be "at fault" for sex, and you need to lead her to it. If the girl was down for everything immediately but you stopped at just a kiss, she will be disappointed, and you'll be a sucker." is problematic, because even if the next line says "escalating until you receive pushback, then back off and **show her you understand her limits**.", you're still assuming that girls will be disappointed if you stop because she said no. She won't be disappointed and you won't be a sucker because the encounter should be over the moment either one of the parties does not wish to continue. Sure, rejection sucks but this way, you're respecting the woman's consent in the matter and you're halting the moment she says no. I don't think the "man" in the relationship needs to be "at fault for sex", and the way that you phrase it is reminiscent of incel/alpha male line of thought, which is why we're saying that you're teaching incel and incel-adjacent ideologies. I think both parties should proceed together at a pace they're comfortable with, and you don't need to assume that women don't want to have sex until you persuade them otherwise using the system outline above. That kind of thinking is what I have an issue with. And referring to women as "mid", "uggos", and "fatties" is rude and demeaning, not to mention sexist.

My bad, I didn't look through the actual pictures. That's a fair point. I think my main thing is, why game the system at all. Like, won't it be stressful to remember 50 different things, and try to approach women like an algorithm? And I guess, why have levels for "nos"? Why not just take the first no and then abort mission, not go for a second attempt?

Even if we do assume that there are some "no"s you can push past(and I have a lot of issues with that initial assertion that Mystic has already covered in her arguments, so I won't repeat them here), how do you know the guys you're teaching will actually internalize that message? By your own admission, it requires a level of social intelligence and awareness that guys who are coming for advice may not possess. So won't spreading this kind of message be problematic since guys will take it as carte-blanche to not listen to women and to just automatically assume they know better? I mean sure you exhaustively list a bunch of signs and signals to parse through, but it's all predicated on the assumption that you have to lead the encounter while the woman is a passive participant. I think that kind of thinking is dangerous because ideally, you should get enthusiastic consent, and the protocols you are teaching are not about obtaining enthusiastic consent since you wouldn't have to be so neurotic and protocol-driven if you had enthusiastic consent. You're operating on the assumption that women initially don't want to have sex, and that men have to persuade women, which takes away the agency from the women you're trying to pursue and it also makes it more likely that she's not actually into it and she wants you to go away because you're being too pushy. Also, if she's saying no, whether "noooooo" or "no!", just back off completely regardless and talk to someone else.

Very cool. Let me know when you want me to design a cover for it! Also don't forget Gotham Knights! I'm excited for Gotham knights because it'll be the first Batman story on CYS, period.

This is a really good effort post. I feel like seeing you go from writing "Crossing a Canyon" to "When the Music's Over" is incredibly inspiring, and I really love how you actually know what it takes to go from a dumb shit posting kid to an incredibly competent writer and grow as a human being. Your post and Ace's post are both well written and you guys had the first hand experience of being kids who got mocked and insulted, but chose to grow from it. I'm really glad you're back and I honestly can't wait to see your upcoming stories(like Blue Monday for instance, it's too good to stay unpublished!)

@Will11, I'd like to grab Goldbird while it's still available

Congrats Fabrikant! You're doing a great job with the reviews! Also thank you for the review on my story, it's very much appreciated!