rgehws

It concerns me because I like winning arguments, and I don't really like seeing injustice over any person for any reason.

Are those valid enough reasons?

It said the combine clicks from two different person from two IPs = about 50 clicks.

So the average is 25 clicks...Clicking something 25 time IS pretty weird, even for someone with anger issues...but some people have problems...

Also, the way you said "it doesn't matter if it's over the internet", make it sound like things done through the internet is okay, when it's not okay done in real life. 

My point is that there's no prove that this really have anything to do with the original author, but with the comments below it's like this case had already been trialed, proven, and the author's guilty. 

Which is wrong in so many ways. 

It doesn't matter over the internet?

You're saying that as long as something is over the internet, it's okay? That's not really nice. Besides, they don't have to be an associate of the author or the author himself/herself to consecutively click on the ratings. The lag will make it so the rating is however much time you click it. So supposedly someone who gets mad because the page isn't loading, they will spam click the rating in anger. And then there we have it...

Flames.  

But like all of those people are flaming the author like when it's not even proven that the author did it.

Same IPs address doesn't mean it's necessary that AUTHOR's IPs address.

STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS! UGH!

Obviously, you did not notice the quotation marks around my words. For your information, I have a sound knowledge on fallacies, and your argument have plenty of them. Apparently it's also a fallacy to be using fallacies incorrectly, as you have done many times in your post.

Also, how many variations do you need pointing out before you admit that you're wrong?

lol what? I don't understand. Please explain.

If you read the story carefully, you would've seen many variations.

"little details and small variations don't matter" fallacy much?

It's like me saying you plagiarize off dictionary.com ... which is ridiculous. 

Read last post to other guy. 

...

It's an anime and manga.

There's no words. Just pictures...

Copy that.

Besides. Go on fanfiction.com. There's are thousands of them that follows canon. No one tells them that they're plagiarizing. 

It's call fanfiction for a reason. Seriously, plagiarizing is taking someone's work and portraying it as your own.  I see no where on the story that says "Hey! This story is mine! I made it! No, there's no such anime or manga call Naruto! What? Who's Mashashi Kishimoto?!" 

It's just ridiculous how people think fanfictions that follows the canon as plagiarism.