I have three main problems with the bill. The first is a political issue, the others are moral issues.
1.) In a capitalistic state like the US where we are supposed to have a free market (even though we don't we're supposed to imitate one) the government should not be able to decide what and where people will buy. To paraphrase chief Justice Kennedy: "Just because we need food to live, and so we all partake in the food market, it does not give the government the right to tell us what food or which market we can buy from". This bill forces those who do not have insurance to buy into it in a certain location, counteracting this capitalistic belief
2.) The bill takes those who cannot pay, and makes them pay anyway. This is not a free system. The bill is not saying "here, have some free healthcare", it's saying "You can't buy healthcare? Well then now you have to buy it from us." It still makes you go to the state, arrange an insurance contract, and pay for it out of pocket, even with government subsidies. It does cut costs for the average person, but it still puts a lean on the income of the poor, and it makes the government spend even more, which won't ease our recession anytime soon.
3.) You're punished for not being able to buy healthcare. If you can't buy it, or want to exercise your personal freedom to not buy it, you're taxed for not receiving the healthcare. So basically the message is "Well, I know you guys are having to pay too much, so now you just have to pay us. Still can't afford it? Too bad, you have pay either way." It's also estimated that 21-25 million non-elderly people will not be paying either way, either because they cannot afford it or because they don't want their liberties to be stripped and will take the penalty
Damn, I started typing this around 9 or 10, and thanks to this mouse virus I'm just now done. .