Read Thread

Post reports about problems or bugs in here.

This bug was closed 1/25/2007: If it looks/works in majority of web browsers, it's good enough for me =-)

Proper HTML

19 years ago

Alex, I would like to tell you that you have almost perfect HTML. I just have two complaints.

1. There should be an alt tag in all pictures. This includes the user pictures.
2. The & signs whereever they are should be &amp.

I can find &s at the following locations.

Bugs & Problems (Forum)
Love & Dating (Game Section)
Help & Info (Site Area)

I hope this helps you out.

Havacoman

Proper HTML

19 years ago

bump...
You should always want the most valid HTML. In fact, XHTML would actually be best for it is today's standard.

solostrike

Proper HTML

19 years ago

why are you telling alex how to do his site? you do know he posted something about a venture(hiddennetwork.com) so he may be busy...

Havacoman

Proper HTML

18 years ago

It is a bug. It needs to be fixed.

Rodney

Proper HTML

18 years ago

What does "Bump" mean?

Havacoman

Proper HTML

18 years ago

"Bump" is the web-speak term for moving a thread up to the top of the list in a forum.

JJJ-thebanisher

Proper HTML

18 years ago

That I tought Havacoman.

Also Havvy let Alex run his own danm site, if he doesnt want to have the most current form of XHTML he doesnt have to. That means if he wants to run BHTML he can...

uhh yeah actually yeah screw bhtml.

My point still stands though, its not really a bug its just something you want updated. It's a bug as much as CYS is to me.

Havacoman

Proper HTML

18 years ago

Actually, it's more or less improper coding for the parent of HTML and XML. I think that's UML.

alexp

Proper HTML

18 years ago

It's SGML -- but, if you'd really like to be nit picky, you should check out http://validator.w3.org/ -- that checks for valid HTML/XHTML documents. Very few (if any) sites pass that, I know mine sure dont ... it's just too high of a standard, and web borwsers are very forgiving ...

Havacoman

Proper HTML

18 years ago

That's what I used, or a variation of it. "Total Validater", an extension for firefox does exactly that.

It was the only mistake, and well, you'll have one of the few websites that doesn't have an error.