My outbox is only supposed to be 4 pages, so why does it say 1175?
To be honest i dont know what your talking about. it could be that you've sent 1175 messages out. Which would be an impressive number considering i havnt sent anywhere near that many.
I've only ever sent messages to two people
There is no way I could've sent 1175 messages. At most, 8.
It confuzzles me
I cant see the picture you posted, only the top portion, i dont see what you are talking about.
Alright, I went to my outbox And for some reason it said I have 1175 pages of messages, which is impossible, there should only be four pages, like my inbox.
When I tried to go past the fourth page it said "The message was not found"
What I'm asking is why does my outbox say I have 1175 messages when I really only have about 8? It's not that big a deal, I'd just like to know what happened.
(and confuzzles is my word for confuses)
Well im bumfuzzled as to why you even have 4 pages. I have a couple hundred messages in my outbox, but i only have one page.
alright, now I'm really confuzzled
They aren't pages, each one is an individual message. For example, in my inbox it says X of 1089 as I have 1089 inbox messages. In my outbox, if I'm viewing the message seventh from the top, it would say 7 of 530, as my outbox has 530 messages in it.
As for why secretstarz's outbox says she has over 1000 messages, I have no clue. It's not pages though, it's individual messages. Just clarifying.
Is that the number of messages the person I was messaging has?
It wouldn't be that. Try deleting some messages (I can only see the top sliver of your pic so I don't know what it actually looks like) and seeing what the message goes down to.
Top sliver?
Do you mean the bottom was pixelated out? I did that because that part wasn't relevent to my confusion
it's not blurry like I would expect from pixilation. Just that everything below the CYS logo is completely white untill the next comment.
That's weird. I can see it just fine.
I deleted a couple of messages but it still says 1175...
I couldn't help but try to decipher the identity of the blurred out name. I'd say it's fergie14233.
You'd be correct
I delete my in and outbox regularly, so I can't help with this forum very much anymore.
Bo this is a tread, a forum is a group of threads, normally it wouldn't bother me but you make that terminology mistake alot, then you said it can go either way, and it cant. off subject anyways.
Forum
I know the conotation of forum is the big "envelope" I guess you could say, but the denotation could easily be used for this as well. Plus, Ugi, I don't like the way you made such a big deal about me correcting your gross spelling and grammatical mistakes, but its perfectly fine to complain about what you think forum means. But fine, if you want to push the forum issue, despite the definition above, prepare for the return of the "grammar nazi".
Weird, I couldn't find those definitions on my go-to dictionary sites. Could you tell me where you got that from? It seems like something I should check into if it has more modern uses of the word, as it is I took the two closest closest definitions of the word I could find.
But you didn't actually use a dictionary or other credible source? Crap I could have used that.
Its not a debate, its not about being winning or lossing, its about what is right and wrong, you are wrong. lol
I'm right and your right, seeing as there is no actual definition of forum applicable to this conversation. Thats not a debate, thats a fact (remember that the word fact allows it to be disproven as well, so if you can find a definition please post.)
Bo, no your not right, This is a thread.
That is quite common. Many words are used for other purposes than their actual definitions (such as cursewords).
Remember when we were talking about the word "supernatural"? Well, like I said then, this is a word that I believe has no meaning, but I still understand what people are referring to when they use it.
Thats called the conotation. As in the meaning associated with the word that is not the actual definition. The actual definition is denotation. Like the denotation of ass is donkey, but how many people who use today are reffering to a donkey?
HAhahahaa when people miss use words I act confused and eplain to them by deffinition what they said. they end up being the ones confused if i continue that process long enough.
Yes, outwitting others can be a fun way to spend the day.
But the definition is not a collection of threads. I tried to ask Zikara if it was an actual definition, and although she didn't give a straight answer, it sounded like she made those descriptions through what she thought it was.
Although, I don't normally like to accept Wikipedia, there isn't anything to base it against, so I'll accept it for this topic. I admit I lost this.
Second time, its not about losing or winning. it wasnt a debate. Its about being correct or being incorrect.
Ugh, Ugilick, ever heard of the phrase "Let sleeping dogs lie"? You really need to learn it. By saying I lost the debate (and it was a debate if we exchanged ideas to see who was correct), I'm saying you're correct and I'm incorrect. However, I don't like empty threats, so my ultimatum will come through, prepare for the return of the grammar nazi.
if I feel I legitimately lost something, I'll admit it.
I beleive i failed to properly express what i meant. My intention was that by saying I lost, means that i failed to prove my point, and is not the same as, oh i see now I was wrong. What I'm trying to get at is that in a debate people try to argue there point rather or not what they are saying is actually correct. Then "lose" or "win" depending on rather or not they did better then there opponent, regaurdless of who's side of the argument is actually right. This still isnt exactly what im trying to say, Im a speaker more so then a writer.
So by being able to out smart your opponent you can make something that is not actually true, become true?
You mean just like the Nazis made the fact that Jews were inferior true, and then the Allied Powers made it true that they were equal after they outsmarted the Nazis? Are do you mean when MLK convinced the nation that what was previously true (that Blacks were inferior) false, and made it true that all races are equal? You see, what is true or not true is based off what we believe. What we believe is true today, may be false in the next century, decade, or even year.
What we think is true, isnt automatically true. that was a ridiculouse argument.
ridiculous* That*
How can you say it's not? For all we know, Christianity is a lie, and the universe is controlled by a man who talks to his cat named Lord all day long while continuously being surprised that pencils write. Now, if I walked up to someone and said that was true would they believe it? We thought that Pluto was a planet for the longest time, so it was true. Later, they disproved it and said it wasn't, now that is true.
LOL, that doesnt make any sense, think about what your saying. Your first few lines actually proved my point. What we think is true, isnt always true. Did you even think for a second? lololololol
doesn't* isn't*
You mean my point that what we think is true we believe to be true untill we are proven wrong? Yes I did think about that. Now, like I said earlier, calm down and read that through rationally while keeping in mind what I'm trying to prove. I know you get irrational when you are insulted, embarrased, or when things simply aren't going to plan, so I'm not going to have any hard feelings, but your free to feel whatever you like.
outsmart*
If i get into an argument with a total moron about how many cards are in a standard deck of playing cards and convince him that there are 47. does that make it true? no, im afraid it doesnt. Quit being combative.
I* Does* No* I'm* doesn't*
Answering a question you yourself posted is not beign combative. Accusing others irrationally is combative, however.
The form in which you posted the question is combative. Also pointlessly correcting grammer in order to agitate, which is failing, Is also combative. I gon mak lot mistak so u wast u time coricting.
Answer* not question, my bad.
is* I'm* going* make* a lot* of mistakes* you* waste* your* correcting*
You can mess up as many times as you want, but it does have a point. The point is that you have grossly misspelled many words and used a lot of grammatical errors, and I want you to see that so you can correct them. My point isn't to agitate (although if that was my purpose it would still have a point, if you didn't notice), so it isn't combative.
"What we think is true, isnt automatically true. that was a ridiculouse argument." - ugilick
That, however, is a combative response to an argument. Now, I know that one side that is being combative often sees others as being offensive for the slightest instances and most meaningless mistakes, so please calm down.
I* I* "Oh, I see now I was wrong."* their* regardless* I'm* I'm*
It was a debate, even by your own description. We did both argue our points, but I wasn't correct, I simply thought I was. Your side did win because you did better than me, regardless meaning you could have been right just as much as you could not have been.
I am swayed, though, but who did better than me depends. Zikara did a great job of defining things, but she failed to cite her sources, so I was forced to see that as what she thought it meant. You, on the other hand, made your initial argument, then it felt like you just continually said "I'm right, your wrong" Like that's the only argument you needed. 3J finalized it by both taking actual definitions and citing them.
If you would please post any further continuation to the argument down here, that would be great. We simpoly don't have room anymore and it makes it easier for 3J to delete later :)
I said ultimatium come through because I honestly didn't know how to say that lol. Also (I was wondering this as I was typing it) in the term "grammar Nazi", should grammar be capitalized as well seeing as it is part of the name?
Actually definition three of truth is the loosest definition, and is in fact Perceived truth, which is different from truth. Even if none no the truth that does not change the truth, but if everyone thinks one thing is true, it is a perceived truth. An example, Bob kills John, Bob's lawyer convinces everyone that Bob did not kill John. True or False, Did Bob kill John?
