Non-threaded

Forums » Writing Workshop » Read Thread

Find proofreaders here, useful resources, and share opinions and advice on story crafting.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

I'm about to post the first "Chapter" to a book I've been writing for a while, (I'm going to edit it out later because I'm not sure I want my name and actions here tied to whatever this is going to be) and I need to know if it grabs your attention effectively, and what kind of first impression it gives you, and if you would continue reading. Can you do that, please? That'd be great.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

I would. Though, I doubt I'll be welcome to.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

I didn't know you were psychic, Mason!

It's down there now. Just gimme your thoughts.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

DO NOT REPLY.

    And now, it's gone! Wheee!

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Is this any good as an opening?

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Wow. There was a few grammar mistakes, but that was one hell of an intro for a horror game.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Dammit, that was supposed to be funny. I'm going to scrap the whole damn thing!

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

I don't get it.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Well, you see, the slugs represent cancer, and Dave reminds me of this War orphan I know who... On second thought, I forgot where the joke was going halfway through the vein-snapping. But it was going to be hilarious, I assure you.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Sounds like it. But does cancer impregnate you?

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

I was using Impregnate as an easy, three-syllable metaphor for "White Oobleck poked a hole in his skin with tentacles and started systematically turning his insides into soup."

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Lol.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

No joke about how, ironically, Mason made a grammar mistake within a post about correcting your grammar?

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Muphry's law.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

Where?

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

It's a good setup, but there's not really any tension. I think you can improve on the following points:

-  The imagery is nice, but there's way too much of it. If I were you, I'd cut out like 75% of it, leaving only the most evocative details, and focus on what's happening instead. I'd have stopped reading after the first paragraph if I were casually browsing.

- You stop to give us exposition about slugs, how you kill them, etc. You should be showing all of this through the action.

- Dave seems very blasé about hunting this slug thing. He just kind of dispassionately informs us about what it is, how you kill it, and what happens, but there's no sense of urgency to the situation, so I'm not invested in what's going on. Dig deeper into his emotions. I don't know about you, but I'd be pissing my pants if I were fighting an evil slug monster.

- It might be nice if you can come up with a better hook. A good first sentence or paragraph should have some kind of unexpected or ironic twist that intrigues us and makes us want to keep reading to understand what's going on.

I also personally don't like the narrative conceit of killing the narrator at the end of an introduction. It's been done a lot, and it makes me feel like I just wasted my time reading about this person. It also makes your story really easy to put down because I have to expend the initial energy to get involved in the narrative again.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago
Ax went into some good points, so Ill just add this nugget.

- You fall into a fair chunk of passive voice, Sent. If you re-write those passive sentence in the active voice, it should give the story a more energetic vibe.



ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

As much as I joke about this passage being a joke, a lot of the whole work is a sort of Candide comedy in a Game-Of-Thrones format, so I guess by being passive about the whole thing I was trying to emulate that, even though there was no comedy to be had. Although the original purpose of the passive voice was establishing that Dave was a bit emotionally detached for reasons that would've been established later. I guess Dave wasn't a strong introductory character for this reason, so I'll definitely bring more hirelings down with him in later editions of the scene.

ATTENTION GRABBER.

9 years ago

-Yeah, I remember deliberately trying to get anything gross I could say down when it came into my head, I'll see if I can cut down on it or spread it out a bit more tactfully.

-This next bit's cut out because it covers plot details, and, again, I'm not sure if I want this book tied to CYS. I'll send you a PM.