Apostle

I was impressed with the quality of the writing and the original topic and setting. I thought it very much addressed the "lone hero" theme in an original way as well, dealing with Christian spiritual heroism rather than more typical martial heroism. And the story itself addressed that issue in the alms/throwing away the sword scene. That was good.

However.

The story is essentially wholly linear, and many of the binary choices are merely encyclopedia entries. Interesting stuff. But not even choices--they are dead ends that end right back at the original choice. The only exception is choosing to stay home (aka, rejecting the premise of the game, leading to a swift end, which is a really tired design choice). Choosing the sword leads to a scene of throwing the sword away, which is thematically neat, but has the effect of negating the choice I made.

Finally, of course, the game is unfinished. In spite of that, I think there is something here to like, and I hope the author finishes it. It shows hard work in polishing the prose.

OK, so the writing is competent, the historical research seems detailed, and the writer seems to have a genuine interest in the subject matter. The encyclopedia sidebars are an interesting way to present the information, and yes, I did learn a few things.

But I have some major reservations:

(1) What exactly does this have to do with a "lone hero"? I assume Marcus, heading off to Rome on his own, is intended to fill that role. However, in what little bit of the story that has been revealed so far, this doesn't really seem to meet the contest criteria. There is no character arc, there is no peril, there is no triumphant victory. Marcus simply hears a voice inside his head, obeys it, and meets some nice people. That's it.

(2) As others have mentioned, the branching is minimal. I read two endings, and I'm pretty sure that's all there is at the moment. The way this is shaping up, the story will be mostly linear, with choices made early affecting the outcome later. I'm not saying that's bad. I'm just observing.

(3) Although this story is very informative, as a non-Christian I have lots of questions about this era that "Apostle" doesn't attempt to answer. It's certainly an interesting perspective to look back to this early period when Christianity was more of a cult than a formal religion, and the people now celebrated as saints were literal martyrs persecuted for their beliefs.

But why did something that began in Israel among the Jews find so much fertile ground in Rome? The Hebrews remained Jewish, but the pagan occupiers became Christian. That's one of several paradoxes I've never been able to satisfactorily explain.

It's pertinent to this story because I think it's key to establishing both the characters and the time period. This is a society that still thought Jupiter was a god, not a planet, and so these early Roman Christians were making a deliberate choice to turn away from the beliefs and traditions of their parents and grandparents. That's a pretty profound decision to make.

So while it's nice to know the different types of swords and daggers one could buy at the market, or to see the Lord's Prayer in Latin, I'm more interested in the demographic shifts that were happening. What segment of the Roman population did Christianity appeal to, and why? What would compel a person to join what was essentially a secret cult at the time? Why was it worth risking their lives?

Smugly suggesting that it was the pursuit of truth or the forgiveness of sins isn't enough; that implies these people understood the old gods to be false, and that they saw themselves as sinners requiring forgiveness. There had to be something more basic than that. The new cult of Christianity had to be meeting some cultural need, which would explain why it took root in southern Europe instead of, say, the Near East or northern Africa.

None of this needs to be explained in significant detail in an "edutainment" storygame. But these characters were people who were faced with the actual decision to worship either Jupiter or the Hebrew god -- and they made a rather peculiar decision, considering the times in which they lived. If the author can understand the reasons why in his own mind, it might help him draw the characters more insightfully, and establish the perils of their times with more clarity.

Otherwise where I see this going, when the story is built out and expanded (as I certainly hope it will be), is a rather dry and stilted retelling of Important Events leading to an Inevitable Outcome. I'd rather read a more immersive tale that helped me understand these people and their decisions better. Hopefully, I'm not asking too much of a believer to step back and take a more objective look at the origins of his faith.

So, I really am conflicted on this story. Theology is both one of my favorite subjects, and very important to me, so I was very interested in this story. And in some ways the story delivered, while in other ways it really did not. I'll start by talking about the good.

The encyclopedia entries were rather interesting. Not much new information in there for me but I always do enjoy when stories add entries like this. It's just a bit of extra work that I feel adds a lot to story. I also felt that this story touched upon an era of Christianity that most modern christians are not readily aware of. Using CYOA games as an educational medium to teach about somewhat obscure topics is something I am always a fan of. But now that leads me to the negatives.

The story felt very short. My first playthrough was literally six pages. In that time, it felt like honestly not much happened. Another major problem was the lack of meaningful choices, or really, any choice at all on some pages. The story wasn't badly written by any means, but it was very clearly unfinished. I understand that you say you ran out of time but you had over a month to write this. I really do think that you can make this into a very interesting and informative story if you spend more time on it, and if you do add more I will happily reread and re-review this. But for now I honestly can't recommend this.

Either way, it was an interesting read, and I really hope you do something with this story in the future.

Hello! I'm a Christian and I found this to be wonderfully educational. You clearly worked hard at researching and incorporating that research into your story. You've opened my eyes to how works such as a CYOA game can worship the Lord! Thank you for your hard work. God bless you!

im a christian too!!!!!!!!!

€##( idk how to do a fish :(
love the christian message in the midst of all the crazy #$&+@?¢©\=*% whatever junk of this world.

as Jesus said in john 17, we're in this world but not of it.

thank you for this risky evangelism in this world of inappropriateness and hate!!!!!!!!

---annonymous Christian



<3

I got the short ending at first, and I really liked the style of writing. Good job!

Too centered around around a controversial thing. What if I’m atheistic?

The writng is nice but there arn't many options to choose from. This feels like a short story copied into a story game format.
Not bad but you should make more options next time...

Good writing-7

format-5 (I don't know how I feel about the big text)

Choices-2

4.3/8

good

This seems like something one would read in a small book that would be given out at church for kids to read given it's simple nature and explanation of some aspects of Christianity. Nothing wrong with that, in fact it does a great job at doing so, but probably got low rated because this just isn't it's targeted audience really.

Not only that though, but the story is linear, though with what it was and what you seemed to be trying to do with it, I don't think branching out was your goal which again is fine as it read more as a learning experience rather than a story.

The game also seems to be rather bare in some aspects while in others it has more information which feels really off.

Other than that though I myself didn't really enjoy it but I'm sure someone might have.