In this story inspired by Watership Down, you play as Hops, a average, run-of-the-mill rabbit forced to flee with the other furry woodland creatures as the Titans destroy your home.

Entry for Sherbet's Summer's End Synergy Contest.

A short horror story where you're hazed on Halloween night. While others are trick-or-treating, you're involved in a fight for your life.

Entry for EndMaster's 2024 prompt contest.

Story prompt: A game revolving around carrying out a terrorist attack. There's actually several within this game, the method and motivations varying depending on your playthrough.

Warning: this story, while not explicit in accordance with site rules, does have sections involving murder, SA, incest, bestiality, racial undertones, and societal class discrimination. Essentially you're playing as a sick fuck who's also rich. Also keep in mind that while your protagonist can complete their objectives depending on how you play, there is no 'happy ending,' per se.

I mean, you could still finish the essay in hopes of getting a commendation, or at least bragging rights that you actually did what you were assigned while your opponent is a dead noob.

This idiot got himself banned.

It's a gif of somebody tying a noose. Basically telling Jon to hang himself.

I'm not sure if he knows how to tie a knot. That's why I usually recommend belts.

Imma say it: you were annoying when you first showed up, but you've definitely shown a more positive personality shift since.

Jon's been banned.

And his educational system.

And I can understand not being rewarded. Commendations aren't exactly just handed out for anything (or at least, they're not supposed to be) and are generally for comments that are lengthy, detailed, well-rounded, cover parts of the story that other commentators haven't or cover them from a different angle. I don't see anywhere in the conversation where I mentioned rewards. I never mention commendations, gold stars, or the "of Avon" title. Simply that a comment can be serviceable, as in of use, with a couple of paragraphs. Which is why, yes, when I mentioned your article, I was referring to the first part of the paragraph you referenced. Because I thought Will's requirements for a review in the original posting he made were specifically:

"Reviewers pledge to complete a requested review within 4 weeks of assignment to a decent standard and can have up to 3 active requests at a time." I was trying to point out that a review that offers well-rounded feedback such as positives and negatives, game errors such as SPAG or loops, ect. would be considered decent or serviceable. 

Mizal made a comment about people skimming or bragging about ratings bombing as an extracurricular (which would in itself indicate the lack of reward). I responded by trying to point out that a review that is a couple paragraphs long isn't exactly skimming or ratings bombing. I'm sure the part of my comment where I threw shade at SO is probably where the ratings bombing comment came from, but that was honestly just meant to troll SO for making comments that had nothing to do with the story. SU still would have gotten a four regardless, since while his story was good for a beginner (better than my own first story) it still didn't really click for me or have any type of deeper plot line, character engagement, ect. Even the world building felt like a dime store Jurassic park. But the effort put into it and the original idea of having a content streamer be the MC was definitely something I had to give credit to (and those two positives are things I mentioned in my game review, which carried a mix of both positive and negative feedback).

And yeah, I agree that a reader should be honest about if they didn't read the full story, which is why in my reviews I tend to explicitly state which branches I read and if I can't go farther into the story because it doesn't hold my interest, then I tend to say that.

Doubt it. From what I understand, he took all the other featured reviews and ran them into an AI to generate a newer review that was basically a mashup of all the real ones.

Oh sorry. I meant "who is daiki?"

I think Daiki was busted for using AI reviews though.