Forums » Feature Wishing Well » Read Thread

Okay, somebody could make a crappy lenth 2 game and get 10 points while another person can make an incredible lenth 8 game but only get 10 points. I think the scoring system should be made different.

1 and 2 rating games only get 2 points for a publish.
3 gets 5 points for a publish
4 to 6 are average and should get 10 points squarely. So most games points won't change.
7 get 15 points per publish. These are hard to make.
8s! which are rare should get 20 full points for making a game.

Ya and edit that right now, so I dont have to go make another 8.  Good idea Havac.  And plaer rating.  If a game is rated 8, it should be given an extra 8 points, if it goes down one, then author loses one.  so someone coould make a length one game, with a player rating one and get 3 points.  Someone could make a length 8, with a player rating 8 and get 28.

quality than quantity here. I like Ocean Adventure, it is sooooo short but it isnt boring at all.

It is rewarding for hard work.

but sometimes people only focus on that ONE characteristic of it being long and make a crappy game. or they make a long game with little description.

Some make short crappy games.

Okay wll then use my Player rating thing.  And you should get a +10 for getting into top games and -10 for getting out of it again.