Part of what you said is correct, and the other part would require a lengthy response from me — but it's 1 a.m. now and I need to sleep so I can wake up for Suhoor.

And by "brutal suppression of youth," are you referring to Iran? If so, please provide a few sources so I can verify them and get back to you.

Good night — or rather, good evening to you!

I haven't done much research on that.

And could you explain its relevance to what I said?

If it's true, then yes — Iran was meant to become the mayor of a US-controlled "New Middle East."

And in the end, even if you have the best journalists in the world and countless tourists, it doesn't matter to the people when their beliefs are attacked (like the Shiraz Arts Festival), when various ethnic groups and nationalities (Kurds, Turks, etc.) face identity erosion and forced modernism, and when you insult their religious leaders — who hold great influence in society.

You're almost right. That was a relatively good and comprehensive analysis.

But you've underestimated Iran's role in this matter.

I'm not exaggerating my country's power, but as long as Yemen's Ansarallah controls the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and Iran itself controls the Strait of Hormuz, Trump cannot view Iran merely as a distraction.

This is in addition to the other resistance groups scattered across the region and the many small hacker groups that work against Israel — either for money or out of conviction.

Refer to:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.bbc.com/persian/iran/2016/03/160311_l26_iran_us_new_york_dam&ved=2ahUKEwjGtPPvyeuSAxUsNvsDHbbMFv0QFnoECB4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw3ywzuX4jnLHJ8R_H-Cfa8m

Furthermore, in Trump's numerous messages and in the ongoing negotiations, he has repeatedly pointed out exactly what you mentioned. Trump has sought a symbolic attack — expecting a symbolic response from Iran — in order to create a "distraction." Iran has understood this and has rejected any kind of symbolic strike. Though the outcome of the negotiations could be anything, because the current government is Western-leaning (aside from our current clown of a president, who is a puppet in the hands of Iran's Westernizers), and Trump is also insane.

Moreover, Israel's hostility toward Iran and its actions goes back further than this. Israel does not want Iran to have long-range missiles — the most powerful non-nuclear weapon capable of shifting the balance — and over the years, it has assassinated many of our nuclear scientists, acts that have been met with silence in international forums.

And yes, Iran's current government trusts more in democracy and negotiation with the West than in adhering to old principles and traditions — and we saw the result of that in the 12-day war.

In fact, your reasons are valid, and they coexist alongside mine.

That's an interesting analogy, but it's incorrect.

As I told our friend Fluxion, I don't place blame on you — because you're expressing views shaped by your own country's media, which has naturally built a negative image of our nation.

In any case, there is no sensible government, revolution, monarchy, etc., that would show leniency and compassion toward armed aggressors intent on killing people and destroying their revolution — especially after they've carried out assassinations and bombings.

For example,

https://t.me/Squad_iran/128841

The link above shows an example of a bombing during a speech by Iran's then-president, who is now the current leader of Iran. What do you think would be the appropriate response to such individuals?

And finally, regarding the January 6th protests: those protests were initially very peaceful — until a number of anti-government extremists decided to exploit them.

In your opinion, in the land of the self-proclaimed leader of the world, the United States, what is the penalty for killing a police officer?

And even more heinous than that, what is the punishment for setting fire to mosques — the most important symbol and second home of many people in a Muslim country?

And by "international newspaper of your own country," do you mean Iran International? Or BBC Persian? Voice of America? Or Radio Farda?

Iran does not have any well-known international newspaper or network that belongs to it on the global stage.

All the examples I mentioned are owned by American-Saudi interests and operate in service of Western agendas.

Which network or newspaper belonging to a country includes in its programs training on how to make Molotov cocktails to attack the police?

For someone like you, it's only natural — just go to the countryside every now and then and play in the dirt a little. Human beings need to be with nature.

Have you played Skyrim?

What About the Epstein documents? As far as I know, Epstein's connections with Mossad shouldn't come as a surprise. Gathering evidence — and, if necessary, blackmailing people in the future — is fairly common practice.

And about comparing him to other presidents, I don't know much — my knowledge mostly covers the past few years.

And he's under pressure because he has to attack Iran — which is Israel's last capable rival that can strike back at it, and the only remaining Islamic and somewhat anti-Western government that could cause problems for him.

The pure truth.

But your words conceal another truth, which is: indifference in a world full of crime.

Something like the film The Zone of Interest.

But well, that doesn't apply to this young user (

Well, that's okay — I just wanted to show my love for my country, that's all :(

How interesting — at that age, I was playing on dirt fields.

Difference of opinion is always good, and it leads to the growth of thought and knowledge for both sides.

I don't agree with all the policies of the current Iranian government, but I would be happy to hear the opinions of non-Iranians on this matter, which could help improve both sides' understanding of my country.

And I expected nothing less from Trump—he is under a lot of pressure from the Jews and Israel, and he has to release that pressure somewhere :(

And yes, I understood his comparison, and I wanted to show him the truth as I see it.