Fun Stuff Part 2

Player Rating1.94/8

"Too few ratings to be ranked"
based on 49 ratings since
played times (finished )

Story Difficulty2/8

"walk in the park"

Play Length4/8

"A well spent lunch break"

Maturity Level2/8

"choking hazard for children under 4"
Contains content that may not be suitable for persons under age 6. To compare to the movie rating system, this would be G.

This is a really short game of riddles. If there are any problems please tell me in your comment. Also, if you have any good riddles please tell me in your comment and I will add them to the game if I like them (I will pretty much add all of them because I need them. You have no idea how short this game is).

Player Comments

Riddles are easy. And apollo... EndMaster didn't write dungeon stompage...
-- MinnieKing on 1/9/2017 1:21:26 AM with a score of 0
Some of the riddles made no sense, like the one with the bus driver. How was I supposed to know his eye color? You should check out Dungeon Stompage by EndMaster. When your asked a riddle, you can type out the answer. See if you can figure out how to do this and your "story" would get a much higher rating.
-- Apollo118 on 9/10/2016 5:21:43 PM with a score of 0
it sucked booty cheeks
-- nawuisha on 9/9/2016 2:08:12 PM with a score of 0
You were so afraid that things would be obvious... while just putting the "none of the above" is just so obvious. Still, I really liked the idea, especially when "interacting" with the suspects and choosing doors. Maybe you could expand the answers with the players "other" suggestions?
-- The_A on 8/21/2016 2:54:53 PM with a score of 0
I personally think this is a rating on four, it was a pretty fun way to pass time, and your riddles are fun to play even though I already knew a couple. But your system for answers was terrible and needed to be worked out properly. If the riddle doesn't fit the format, don't put it in the game. It was kind of complex none the less at certain times and I found it more fun than many other riddle games I've played. Nice.
-- Warriorstar on 8/8/2016 11:41:48 AM with a score of 0
so, how did I do?
-- hamish on 8/1/2016 2:43:08 AM with a score of 0
Wow! 5 riddles! That's ... eh, really?
1. Ah, a old and well known riddle. But at least it's a riddle.
2. Random doors that lead nowhere, and then a random choice. You could just have the character go to the store for furniture or something.
3. Again, a well known riddle
4. This one is a riddle without the number, and also a well known one.
5. (4 on the page) If you are to lazy to even go and check which riddle this is, well no comment.
6. (5) Ey, lets change focus! Who needs riddles anyway, lets just tell terrible jokes. Why not!
And ... you gave up. After 5 riddles and a random joke, you just gave up. And then you decided to publish this, because why not, it's allways good to have more crap on the new stories page. If you actually thought publishing this was a good idea, you should rethink that choice.
-- Mayana on 7/31/2016 9:19:34 AM with a score of 0
Why is not in the puzzles cadory?
-- dragon396 on 7/30/2016 8:59:43 PM with a score of 0
This was a little rough and all over the place but not the worst way to waste two minutes until the very end. Please don't post unfinished work.
-- mizal on 7/30/2016 8:59:30 PM with a score of 0
For the most part, not too bad. Couldn't find any sleeping mistakes, or bad grammar, and the riddles were ok.

The last part was the bit that ruined this. You can't rely your readers to give you ideas. This is your story. You need to put some more effort into these, because you won't get very far by not putting more work into things. 3/8
-- Shadowulf on 7/30/2016 5:01:12 PM with a score of 0
Show All Comments