Forums » The Lounge » Read Thread

Can other people try this thing out and prove it inaccurate for me? Somehow, I doubt that my IQ is 149. 

Free IQ Test

http://www.free-iqtest.net/score.asp

I've already taken this test before. I got something around 135.

Oh. Well that proves it false.

XD

IQ Test

I mean, it's possible?

Actually, no it's not. First of all, this test is designed to make people feel better about them self. Also, 20 questions is a terrible way to measure intelligence (especially ones that are this fucking easy). 

Didn't Einstein have an IQ of 169 or something?

Somewhere in the 160s.

According to the Internet, 160.

These IQ tests are all fake. 

As someone who's gotten a "legitimate" IQ test, no.

Here's one that looks much more accurate - I got a score of 96.

http://www.seemypersonality.com/personality.asp?p=Quick_Test&i=sIQ

I checked out the personality one too, and that seems rather accurate as well. Little strike through for the small bits that aren't accurate.

"Your Personality Type Is The Producer (BICAS)

Producers are emotionally balanced, which means that they are less prone to depression and are able to cope well with feelings of anxiety, anger and vulnerability. Due to their independence and reserve, sometimes the Producer can be perceived as arrogant or unfriendly, however this is merely because they don't require the same level of social stimulation or interaction that others may seek. The Producer generally prefers fact over fiction and security and stability over ambiguity and disorder. Sticking with convention and familiar routines is generally best. With a sense of social responsibility and a general trust in others, Producers are often seen as sincere and generous. However the Producer has a refreshing impulsiveness about them, they tend to dislike too many rules and regulations and can be casual and whimsical.

1.35% of people are Producers" 

Ironically, there's nothing in there about being productive. If there was, then it wouldn't fit me at all. There's a whole lot more it describes, about each individual part and all that, but I thought it was a little too much.

Tried the personality test as well:

"Your Personality Type Is The Designer (RIOGS)

Designers are emotionally reactive, which means that they experience their emotions strongly and can be very passionate., however also have a higher tendency to experience emotions such as anxiety, anger and depression. Due to their independence and reserve, sometimes the Designer can be perceived as arrogant or unfriendly, however this is merely because they don't require the same level of social stimulation or interaction that others may seek. The Designer enjoys a good balance between the real world and fantasy, they are mostly aware of and in touch with their emotions. Being open-minded to new and unusual ideas helps them to interact with the world. With a healthy skepticism of the motives of others, and a belief in justice and being self made, sometimes the Designer can come across as guarded or intimidating. However the Designer has a refreshing impulsiveness about them, they tend to dislike too many rules and regulations and can be casual and whimsical.

5.01% of people are Designers"

Part of it doesn't seem like things I'd do. I mean, I'm a pretty charismatic guy.

Edit: Oh shit, there's more.

*Reads 18 more pages*

Oh, in that case, that kinda fits. Charismatic, easy-going, secretly very depressed, It's all here.

Took that as well, got The Designer. Also, you sure that you're not arrogant? I can see it...

Here's the in depth thingy:

"Your Personality Type Is The Designer (RIOGS)

Designers are emotionally reactive, which means that they experience their emotions strongly and can be very passionate., however also have a higher tendency to experience emotions such as anxiety, anger and depression. Due to their independence and reserve, sometimes the Designer can be perceived as arrogant or unfriendly, however this is merely because they don't require the same level of social stimulation or interaction that others may seek. The Designer enjoys a good balance between the real world and fantasy, they are mostly aware of and in touch with their emotions. Being open-minded to new and unusual ideas helps them to interact with the world. With a healthy skepticism of the motives of others, and a belief in justice and being self made, sometimes the Designer can come across as guarded or intimidating. However the Designer has a refreshing impulsiveness about them, they tend to dislike too many rules and regulations and can be casual and whimsical.

5.01% of people are Designers"

... Yeah, I'd say it's pretty accurate to how I am in the real world.

EDIT: Here's the infographic thing:

Eyyy m8 I got that too.

We're not that different, you and I.

Damn right. Ready to break out into song, m8?

Also, Goddammit Tim I was editing the rest of the infographic in.

Kek

goddamn ninja editor i wanna be frank

I got one too, m8:

i'll be fine with being sammy if it means you're happy fam

EDIT: Dope infographic fam.

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!

WOW, there's more for me too!

And here's some people that I've never heard of that I'm apparently kinda like!

...there wasn't anyone I was like listed... I guess that means I'm just that special. :D

Yeah, but at least I'm like Einstein, Da Vinci, Abe Lincoln, Madame Curie, Charles Darwin and Sigourney Weaver!

Wonder where that last one came from... Guess I like to fight off malevolent aliens.

Oh shit, m8, the people keep refreshing!

Also, keep clicking "Next"!

I think that's enough infographics for one day.

There's no more, Brad.

They're all gone.

"Sometimes sad."

WELL GEE I GUESS I'M A HORRIBLE PERSON THEN

It actually gave me the exact same result as the other online test—146. Go figure.

It did? What does it take to get an accurate IQ test?

It isn't a real IQ test unless part of the assessment involves describing how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in excessive detail.

Jumping on the bandwagon.

What a fucking sham the you're kinda like section is. It keeps changing, and it's pissing me off.

Now, the really strange thing is that you only have two weaknesses.

Yeah, I don't know why the second one's not filled in. Bug, or am I that awesome?

Eh, I'm joining too.

"My Personality Type is The Shaman (RIOAS)

"Shamans are emotionally reactive, which means that they experience their emotions strongly and can be very passionate, however also have a higher tendency to experience emotions such as anxiety, anger and depression. Due to their independence and reserve, sometimes the Shaman can be perceived as arrogant or unfriendly, however this is merely because they don't require the same level of social stimulation or interaction that others may seek. The Shaman enjoys a good balance between the real world and fantasy, they are mostly aware of and in touch with their emotions. Being open-minded to new and unusual ideas helps them to interact with the world. With a sense of social responsibility and a general trust in others, Shamans are often seen as sincere and generous. However the Shaman has a refreshing impulsiveness about them, they tend to dislike too many rules and regulations and can be casual and whimsical.

"3.22% of people are Shamans"

I did that one and it seemed pretty spot on :) I got an IQ of 120 which is ok, it told me I'm fantastic with words, writing and numbers but that I have all the creativity of a gold fish and the spacial awareness of a drunk which is reasonably accurate :) Seems a useful site overall.

With the first test I got an IQ of 146. I suspect the second test is more accurate :)

The IQ test returned a score of 120.

According to the personality test, my personality type is:

The Inspector (RICGD)

Inspectors are emotionally reactive, which means that they experience their emotions strongly and can be very passionate., however also have a higher tendency to experience emotions such as anxiety, anger and depression. Due to their independence and reserve, sometimes the Inspector can be perceived as arrogant or unfriendly, however this is merely because they don't require the same level of social stimulation or interaction that others may seek. The Inspector generally prefers fact over fiction and security and stability over ambiguity and disorder. Sticking with convention and familiar routines is generally best. With a healthy skepticism of the motives of others, and a belief in justice and being self made, sometimes the Inspector can come across as guarded or intimidating. However the Inspector generally has good self discipline and is recognized as being able to plan and think ahead.

4.44% of people are Inspectors

Took the IQ test, got 99.

Took that, got an IQ of 139. Had it on my profile for a while, too.

It's very clearly false.

Generally speaking if you’re anywhere above 130, you’re presumably a pretty smart person. Anyone with something in the 160-180 range would have that “super genius” label.

130 and above- Very Superior

120-129- Superior

110-119- High average

90-109- Average

80-89- Low Average

71-79 Borderline

70 or less is considered Retarded, but they classify them further:

51-70- Moron

26-50- Imbecile

0-25- Idiot

130 and above- Very Superior

120-129- Superior

110-119- High average

90-109- Average

80-89- Low Average

71-79 Borderline

70 or less is considered Retarded, but they classify them further:

51-70- Moron

26-50- Imbecile

0-25- Ryder

Lol.

0-25- Chris

-1-anything lower- Ryder

FTFY

A psychologist, probably.

Psychologists just give you pointless tests where you associate every word they say with “stab” and “whore” or those ink blot pictures which all look like vaginas.

I remember taking one of those tests back in college which was supposed to be asking general psychological questions, but it seemed more like it was trying to determine if you were a rapist/woman beater since it asked questions like:

“Do you feel that it's okay to physically restrain a woman to get sex?”

“Do you feel that it's okay to get a woman drunk to get sex?”

“Do you feel that it's okay to yell and bully a woman in order to get sex?”

“Do you feel that it's okay to mentally manipulate a woman to get sex?”

“Do you feel that it's okay to use guilt on a woman to get sex?”

The list went on and on and ON asking the same questions just worded slightly differently.

I felt like they could have just simplified the test by asking if I was a member of the Rapist Patriarchy, where upon I would have just marked “yes” collected my 20 dollars for my time and left.

I thought ODNR only hired people who did feel out the 'yes' bubble for that question.

I remember having to take a sort of career aptitude test in high school that determined I would suck at literally anything I tried to do in life. I think they called it the Kuder or something like that. I know it was phonetically identical to a slang term for female private parts.

Apparently, my I.Q. is 153... Figures.