No Mans Land

It wasn't that bad of a story, but it was extremely difficult to make sense of it because of the poor grammar. Adding paragraphs would be nice, as it was difficult when almost everything was in one, humongous paragraph. Learning to use punctuation correctly would be helpful because it was hard to understand who was talking, especially since you occasionally added quotation marks before the character had even finished speaking. There were a lot of spelling errors, so using spellcheck would be a good idea. Your writing was okay - I think there could've been more detail in some scenes, but it was just . . . okay. As for the choices, it was discouraging how only one was correct, as letting the character go down different paths would be more interesting. It was hard to predict which one would help the character survive, as all of them seemed logical.

Overall, it was okay - I don't think it was the best war game I've ever played, but it wasn't the worst. I think the biggest issue would be the grammar and perhaps the choices/adding more paths. Also, as Kiel_Farren mentioned, commenting on your own game is a bit embarrassing, as people will quickly realize that it's you. I don't think you'll be able to fool many people.

As others have said, the game itself was not bad. The grammar was hard to wade through though. There was also a broken link that didn't carry the story forward (the option to 'stay out of it' when Liam was beating up the soldier). The author's narration of the ending also seemed unnecessary. If it's a sad ending then it will be sad whether you tell us it is or not. If you took this down and did a bit of maintenance (or got someone on the sight to help you out), I imagine this story's score would improve a good amount.

It certainly has potential but the many spelling mistakes and the sometimes badly constructed sentences make it really hard to enjoy the story. I think a proofreader would do your stories a lot of good.

You have potential for good story telling, but no at letting people make their choices. It was pretty short, undecriptive, and flavorless. 1/8

I'm all for WW1 and WW2 stories, but this one is just... need much more improvements. Grammar and writing. Just like everyone said.

Grammar needs work. (missing commas)
Overall good, though.

At least one of the links was broken and this could've used a bit of proofreading, but all-in-all it wasn't a bad first attempt. I hope you spend more time on the next one, though, because there is real potential here.

I did like how there was more than one ending, but even if it was correct, the grammar felt off, and I felt like the choices were 50/50 with no way to actually predict what would happen. Don't be discouraged by my comment though. This has lots of potential, and I hope you keep writing in the future

3/8. Would've been 4/8, as it was decent, but don't praise yourself in your comments. It's tacky at best, and obnoxious or even kind of embarrassing for the rest of us to watch at worst. People are more forgiving with great talent, though. Keep writing and maybe you'll be able to afford that level of cockiness some day.

Well written, realistic war experience :)