12/17/2025

12/17/2025 8:11 PM

7

0

1 win / 0 losses

Architect

hey Wildblue. im bored. wunt 2 chat?????? ;););)

Actually this is a great idea.

Good suggestions! If it strikes your interest, I'll give you some info below. "The Ashen Marches are a bleak, half-ruined region shaped by fire, collapse, and whatever came after the world broke. Once settled lands, they are now choked with ash plains, burned forests, shattered keeps, and old roads that lead nowhere anymore. The sky is often hazy, the ground still warm in places, and ruins from before the collapse poke out of the soot like broken teeth. Monsters and warped remnants of magic roam freely, but so do survivors, scavengers, and strange communities that refuse to die out completely. Nothing here feels finished, like the land itself is still deciding what it wants to become. What defines the Ashen Marches most is movement and survival. People do not settle easily, they migrate, fortify briefly, then move on again when danger creeps too close. There is a constant tension between preserving what little history remains and abandoning it to stay alive. Faith is shaken, trust is thin, and everyone has a different idea of whether the world can be fixed or if its better to just endure it. Some stories contradict each other, some landmarks are only half-remembered, and honestly nobody is totally sure what is myth anymore and what is still out there waiting." -- Directly from the summary of my DnD world

Just a question for any folk who have the time to answer. If I have a DND world -- or in other descriptive terms, a fantasy world -- that I've already made, how would I go about making a storygame about it? Anything I should do differently compared to making a regular storygame, original to CYS?

LMFAO

The man himself! Your "Eternal" storygame is great so far, just wanted to let you know. I haven't made any storygames, so I haven't earned the right to call you a slur, but just imagine I did. <3

Greetings. I've joined this site and been on here for maybe an hour or two. I want to make one thing clear. This is the internet. Nobody actually gives a shit. If they do, they have problems. Honestly, this argument doesn’t really make much sense. Every large website has rude, passive-aggressive, or outright toxic people on it -- that’s not unique, and it’s not new. Expecting a massive, anonymous platform to consistently feel comfortable or considerate just isn’t realistic. If you’re going to spend time online, especially in public forums, you kind of do have to get used to filtering that stuff out or disengaging from it. That doesn’t mean the behavior is good or justified, but pointing at it like it’s some shocking revelation doesn’t change anything. Moderation isn’t perfect, people won’t always listen, and not every uncomfortable interaction will be resolved the way you want. At a certain point, it’s less about how the site “should” be and more about learning how to navigate it without letting strangers get under your skin. Liking a platform while acknowledging its flaws is fine -- but treating those flaws as surprising or uniquely outrageous just feels a bit misplaced.