Exempting situations of revenge, can first-degree murder ever be morally justified?
It depends on who you are. People will say no because owning slaves is unethical and deems those unnecessary in life and just robots in their life. Yes because its crucial and it can make money in rural areas.
Exempting situations of revenge, can rape ever be morally justified?
No. PTSD Inducing and highly selfish.
That sounds like the plotline to a very bad hentai. "When I was her slave, she raped me every day... But now I am the master, and I shall have my revenge!!!" ^_^
I don't think that it would be possible. Aside from the insanity bonus you get during your attempt, some monsters may not even have the anatomy for it.... Like a shoggoth.
I'll give you that, I guess one can hump a fleshblob. Just one question, what do you mean with eyeballs?
I would assume he means fucking one its eye sockets.
Where did you find a picture of Suranna's mom?
In a place where birds go when it rains.
This bit was way too good to be mixed in with the regular retarded Friday night question thread
Whoa, this isn't Suranna's mom you're talking about.
Well, because someone has to post it...
Exempting situations of revenge, can revenge ever be morally justified?
If they wrong one of your family members, it's completely justified to start a series of honor killings that will result in a feud stretching generations.
I'm just thinking... Why is venge not a thing? I mean, in order for one person to get revenge, do they not first have to be venged? As in, to wrong someone who has never wronged you is to venge them.
There was the villain from the 80s Dungeons and Dragons cartoon called Venger.
He seemed to be doing a lot of venging.
Why the fuck is your time posted bar green?
You and Ogre are experimenting? O.O
... Well... Don't knock it till you tried it I guess? No judgments here, I'm an ally but... Please keep your discoveries to yourselves.