I went into the story knowing the twist, as I think were forum members teasing some poor noob at the time by recommending this as a good "romance." But I have to say, I found it hard to review seriously because I wasn't entirely positive how seriously it was intended by mizal (my Mork and Mindy distraction aside).
I'm not saying I didn't like the story; there was just a level of implausibility that kept me from getting deeply involved in the characters. In some ways, it reminded me of Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" in that it was an enthralling read, but it existed beyond the known realm of modern human behavior as I understand it, therefore I was fully aware throughout that I was just reading a story, not a possibility.
I did appreciate that the actual situation was never completely explained--unless there was another, more explicit ending that I missed. I interpret the story to be that the community was tolerant of the gay romance, but when things turned to necrophilia that was a step too far. But then everybody died and there was no one left to judge.
I don't buy the whole "vengeful God" argument one bit, as that is so Old Testament, and not the kinder, gentler God of the New Testament (in which Jesus cavorts with lepers and prostitutes, and then gets himself executed beside a couple common thieves). And at any rate, it is very unlike even the Old Testament God to have such poor aim: in his wrath over the sodomy, he manages to kill everybody but the individual committing the act; that person ultimately has to smite himself.
As I was reading the story, I was unable to place it both geographically and in terms of era. Was this some kind of old-fashioned American setting? If so, even in the nineteenth century there were health departments that would have intervened when the disease started to spread. Is this intended to be some fable set in a mythical Anywhere? This felt more right to me, because as engaging as the writing is, the whole episode seemed to exist within a bubble.
Which is not to say I'm so naive to think that necrophilia doesn't happen; Wikipedia says it's true, therefore it must be.
"Rosman and Resnick (1989) reviewed information from 34 cases of necrophilia describing the individuals' motivations for their behaviors: these individuals reported the desire to possess a non-resisting and non-rejecting partner (68%), reunions with a romantic partner (21%), sexual attraction to corpses (15%), comfort or overcoming feelings of isolation (15%), or seeking self-esteem by expressing power over a homicide victim (12%)."
If this were a question for Family Feud--survey says!--then I would have expected the "rapey" aspects of the first and last categories to be the primary motivations (taking advantage of a fresh corpse that can't say no or report you to the police, or taking advantage of the person whom you just killed yourself). The case of Mirk and Mondy would seem to fall into that 21% category of desiring a reunion with a partner, or that 15% of cases where someone is trying to overcome a sense of isolation. So I guess these things do happen; it's just that I struggle with the concept of it happening so openly without someone coming along to put an end to it.
And so with that layer of incredibility, I read the story with interest, but I couldn't tell where mizal was going with it. Mirk and Mondy are carefully contained within their story, but they are not people I would expect to encounter in the real world.
As for mizal stories with a twist ending, I liked "Agent of Order" much better... although I rushed through my initial reading of that story, and need to go back and give it more attention someday.