Inheritance House

Overall review:
This is a quickish adventure in a haunted house, written using a room-to-room structure with no inventory (that I found). The house is small. The twist here is that when you escape, you can loop back to the start of the game for a new experience in the same space several times. I thought the loop might have been handled a bit differently--I didn't quite realize that I was looping and got rather confused when I played this later and couldn't find the scratching noise in the kitchen! Granted, that's on me for missing your disclaimer in the intro.
It's a cool concept. The looping is neat, and the ideas for the various hauntings are quite good too. I did wish that the house had compass directional indications within since I tried to draw a map, but it's so small it doesn't really matter.
This is a fun quick game which could benefit from more polishing and more attention/time given in the descriptions. But as I said in the playtest, it has the bones of an impressive game.

Tone:
Might have created a bit more sense of atmosphere on page one with illustrative details rather than narrating the emotion, like " It's hard when family dies. It’s harder when they leave you their ratty old cottage in the woods just south of the middle of nowhere!" Tonally, that tells the reader that this is going to be light because of "ratty old cottage" and "middle of nowhere"--you can get a spookier effect with more emotional description. It's the old "show v. tell" thing--if you say "but where did the knife come from?" that's one thing, but if you show the knife suddenly appearing, the reader will think that same thing, and enjoy the process better. Ditto for "The knife has you concerned. Where the heck did that come from?" If you show us this scary situation, we will *be* concerned and wonder.
My biggest comment is that you lean heavily on cliche here. -- middle of nowhere, the statue "almost looks like it is watching you."; "You stare in disbelief"; "This has to be a bad dream"; " must have been the wind"; "go to the light."
Choice Structure:

I don't like the go left/go right structure of choices that don't have any reason to make that choice. How about some description that give me a reason to go left or right--and that could help me get more "into character" too.
Microlevel stuff:

"You remember your uncle telling you he built a new barn a few years ago, it might be nicer than the house." <-- you never want to connect two sentences with a comma. That's called a comma splice, and it hits reader's ears clumsily sometimes. Try a semicolon there (or make it two different sentences.)
Plural of knife = knives
Change "Running right out the back door" to "You run right out the back door."
The font type changes in some room, like the left and right living room.

Note: I wrote this story after getting the first end game link, as I saw all that the story had to offer when I playtested.

This story is a nice and neat little experiment. The death and loop concept isn't an original one, but it's executed very well here. I'd say the concept is what mostly carries it, this almost seems more like a proof of concept for a system than an actual game in some ways.

The writing is good and I respect that you implemented a lot of the suggestions from the thread. A few things you missed, namely Gower's suggestion to include a better reason to go right or left (iirc you included a mention of the barn, but there's no real way to tell where that is), but it's understandable. As for the story itself, it's passable for what it is. Didn't enthrall nor scare me much.

Like I said though, the real good in this story comes from the primary gameplay element: dying/escaping, and then going through again with changes. This keeps things fresh as you don't know what you'll find this go around. Sort of reminded me of Groundhog Day in a way. Still, like I said, this seems like something that would fit nice at home within a longer story. As is, the concept is all that's really carrying the story itself.

Overall, I'd say that for your first shot at a game with various features such as variables and items, it was very good! You didn't have any glitches or bugs or the like, which is more than some of us might be able to say when we first did this sorta thing. I give it a 6/8, would've been a 5/8 but you proved that you cared enough to fix any problems with the story that were pointed out in your thread... Plus, you included me in the special thanks, so I couldn't bare to rate it any lower.

Disclaimer: I am writing this review as I am reading the story, so expect the final takeaway to be at the end.

The premise of the story game is that you inherit this creepy cottage from your uncle, and you get locked inside while heading out to visit the place in person. The game seems to switch back and forth between whether this is a cabin or a cottage, but this is just a minor nitpick.

Now on to the review.

The beginning:

First things first, for some reason, there is this bizarre giant space between the text and the choices. This confused me to the point where I highlighted the text to see if there was secret text in white Avery-style(referring to the Tower of Riddles game), but there wasn't.

In the left and right living rooms, the text is a different font type, and that is really weird to look at. The descriptions are also remarkably sparse. I really want to imagine what this cabin might look like, but the author doesn't give me a lot to work with here.

The cabin contains a number of rooms, all with ridiculously boring descriptions. I traversed through the bedroom, the kitchen, the foyer, the left living room, and the right living room all without the slightest interesting thing happening. When I tried leaving through the Front Yard, the game temporarily stopped me, piquing my interest, as there is no door knob on that side. Finally, I tried leaving through the backyard, ready for this story to end.

And that's when the fun started. As you leave, you hear a haunted harrowing laugh, and then the game loops back to driving to the cottage.

The game itself:

The rooms itself are the same, but this time, you hear strange scratching sounds and get the feeling like you've been here before. And then the rest of the story unfolds.

The writer seems to come alive once the story gets underway. No longer are there boring and drab descriptions of wallpaper and setting.

The death scenes, especially the ones with the floating knives, were really well written. I love the way the suspense built up, slowly as you investigate what happened to the knives, and then they suddenly all float in the air and skewer you to death! Basically, with each encounter, you have 2 choices: death or leaving, and both of them restart the loop.

Once you die, you have the choice of restarting the loop, and trying again, which is really fun. As you return to the house, the rooms change, reflecting the demon that you have to fight. I loved the various encounters, they were remarkably creepy and well written.

As you keep on looping, you eventually figure out that the end goal is to get inside the cellar and rescue a woman trapped inside. I love how the author creatively unfolded this story by leaving little hints and clues in each death/leaving scene. I also like the logic of the author in that some moves, like the dodge roll, don't work in the tight confined space of the shed, but do work in the larger barn. Same with setting the chair on fire, vs setting the bed on fire.

The author really makes you work for that cellar key, which is awesome, because I really enjoyed exploring this creepy house. I ended up getting the ending where it turns out that the woman is actually a demon and I think you escape. Overall, I really loved this game, the writing was on point, and the time loop aspects were so fun to play. The writing was remarkably atmospheric, and the world of this creepy house and demon was remarkably well built. Each loop slowly told me a bit more about what's going on, and I can't wait to reach the other ending. I have no idea why this story is rated a 3.75/8, for me it's a solid 6. I really loved this game, and this author's great writing.

I especially liked how the monster looked like whatever the reader looked like, so that it can have an disturbing effect on the reader no matter what the reader looks like. I didn't care much for the font changes though- they were just distracting and didn't add to the narrative that I could see. The ending also wasn't satisfying emotionally nor in terms of the lore.

Bravo!

WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD

This story has a very creative premise. The beginning of your game set the tone quite well, and left me intrigued to read more. I also really liked the twist that you had at the end of your first run through the cycle; I didn't see it coming. Having the protagonist note new sounds coming from different areas of the house was another neat idea.

I noticed that the story was written in two different fonts. I'm assuming this might have been due to copy/pasting from a word document, but fixing this could improve readability. I also think it could be improved by limiting the number of cycles experienced by the reader. Sometimes, it felt like only one major action could be completed on any given cycle. Why not allow multiple actions to happen on a particular run, and let the reader explore a bit more?

I felt like the use of directions in the links was a bit confusing, at first. After a few runs through the day it was easy to construct a mental map of the (very small) house, but I think the interface could have been improved.

You mentioned in your story description that there are two endings to this game. It seems I got the bad one (regarding shapeshifters), so I'm not sure how to get the other one. Or is the other ending the one where you go into the light? Normally, I like games that include links describing certain concepts, so I liked your idea to include such a link to describe shapeshifters. I don't think this should be done on the last page of your game though.

Overall, the writing was very atmospheric, and it was an interesting idea. I do think it deserves higher than its current rating. (I think that if the above issues were fixed, people would tend to rate it a lot higher.) The writing itself flowed nicely, and the grammar was good as well. The twist with the uncle at the end was also good, too. I was hoping he'd come back to play an important role in the story, since you'd mentioned him in the summary, and he did. Good work.

I really like the repetitive returning to the cabin! Especially with some of the subtle changes to the story each run through makes it all the more interesting of a read!

What I like about this game -- and it is to me more of a game than a story -- is the creative use of the circular structure. This by no means the first storygame to employ such a structure, but they are more complicated to write and design, so kudos on a glitchless first attempt.

What I found less impressive was the weak narrative. I explored the rooms of the cabin because the requirements of the game forced me to do so, but not because I was self-motivated to do so. For instance, all that happens on the first round is that I enter through the front door, exit through the back, and then the game restarts.

SPOILERS AHEAD!

And about those restarts: as they are used here, they are too flagrantly a gimmick, and not a compelling part of the narrative. At the end of each round through the cabin, I have to actively choose to restart. If I hadn't read the game's description, I'd have no idea why. The game does become more interesting with the successive play-throughs, but based on the outcome of each pass, the protag has every motivation to flee as fast as possible, not go back and start again.

And how is it I can remember some things from the previous rounds, but not others? The internal logic of the story is not evenly applied. For instance, each time the demon appears, it is described anew as if being seen for the first time. But I can remember burning the chair, and when the barn and shed appear I can remember they weren't there previously.

This looping structure reminds me a lot of the movie "Groundhog Day" and the ST:TNG episode "Cause and Effect." In each case, the characters are caught in a time loop, forced to relive the same events over and over again. But although the circumstances are the same each time, the characters retain some memory of the past loops, and this changes the experience. The loops are involuntary, and figuring out the way to break the cycle becomes the primary motivation.

In terms of the gamebooks of old, I recall the "Escape from Frome" and "Escape from Tenopia" series used a similar branching structure. You didn't die in those books, but you did wander in circles and hunt for the links that would move you closer to the goal.

As for "Inheritance House," I hope the experience of writing and designing the game proved to be a valuable experience, and that you have learned some useful new tricks to employ on your next storygame.

I briefly played this game on its release. If I remember correctly, I gave it a 4. Let’s see if a second, more in-depth playing with adjust that rating. Onward we go.

So right away I’m conflicted by the story. The first two sentences are confusing for me because I can’t understand if the author is trying to be funny or the second sentence reads funny (in the strange definition of the word). Is inheriting a cottage in the woods really harder than a family member dying? I suppose that depends on the cottage…and the family member.

The house itself is called both a cabin and a cottage. I always understood those two words to describe different structures, although people may use them interchangeably. A quick internet search told me a cabin is a small structure made completely from wood, and a cottage is a living place made with multiple materials. Not sure if using both descriptions really impacts the story much, but an inaccuracy is an inaccuracy.

I hate to restate what everyone else is saying, but the font changes and paragraph spacing gets distracting. Sometimes words are capitalized that shouldn’t be. I saw this with page links. “The Foyer” vs “The kitchen.” I did have a thought the different fonts and gaps could be the author attempting to disorient the reader, sort of like a shaky camera or crooked angles in a horror film. If the “mistakes” were intentionally, I applaud the idea.

While the first visit to the house feels bland, the story real comes online on the following loops. It reminds me of that one horror game where you walk in a looping hallway discovering different clues (or hauntings) each time. I’m blanking on the name. I understand the repetitive structure. It’s like a tribute to Through Time.

My biggest criticism is mostly towards the beginning loop. Finding the locked door behind you is a nice touch, but there isn’t a ton that motivated me to drive back to the house. While additional details continue to be added the further you get, there’s not a lot in the beginning to draw in the reader. I think that’s why I rated it a 4 originally. After multiple attempts, I’m keeping my rating the same. I have more respect for the story, and really think it’s on the cusp of hitting a 5 with a few more interesting details added.

Summarizing my thoughts, I think Inheritance House is a good, quick little game. The repetitive nature gives a familiar feeling towards each loop. While its shortcomings include lack of characters, a fully-formed plot, and opening hook, the game itself is light and engaging enough. I get the feeling the game was churned out in a short period of time, and I would have liked to seen a well-developed story in addition to the game aspect. It may not be one of the top storygames on the site, but it’s entertaining for what it is.

No offense to you, but this game almost had slight hype coming to the release of it. It's a nice long game, but it has a lot of issues.

Number one the repeating looping structure, after about the five times in the loop, it starts to get boring, and the reader will lose interest, probably skimming there way through the rest of the game. It just gets boring, like restarting a game five times you lose interest in it luckily, my drive to finish the game got me through the next nine loops. It also explains the number of reviews about the story.
Although it is not as long as some of the games on the site, because of the way it is structured, it seems SUPER long, I recommend that instead of having five loops have 3 or 4 even and instead of repeating, it make the in-between part enjoyable.

Now there were a few grammar errors not enough to full-on bitch about — so good job for that.

It's just the structure of the game that ruins it overall. Making an exciting looping game is very difficult, and I understand that, but it's like watching a T.V. series after the five or 6th season you get bored because it's the same old thing.

So good job, it was a great idea, and I like the overall quality, but it could be more interesting, and there could be a better backstory and an explanation of the time loops.