You're a homophobic bully.
Because you constantly use homophobic terms then you pretend that there's nothing wrong with it. I'd like to think you're smart enough to know how harmful it can be to them, but maybe you just like acting like a lying sociopath because you enjoy seeing gay people suffer.
I've been through how faggots not being used in a homophobic context, although I do have a history of doing things that could be described as painful to gay people.
And I've told you how faggot is almost always used in a homophobic way. The meaning of a word doesn't change just because you want it to.
So you admit that you torment gay people. You're a sick man.
And I believe that ended with you not understanding the use of idioms or the evolution of language.
What can I say? We all have our kinks.
I fully understand the evolution of language. It just so happens that 'faggot' is still a homophobic term and it has been for some time.
I don't have any kinks. Speak for yourself.
I disagree completely, and as a straight dude who once agreed that we should say "Trying out the only viable options which are unlikely to succeed when faced with a bad situation" instead of "Clutching at straws", I don't give a fuck what you think about it.
I always tend to.
How does that take away from the point that I'm making? Is it your fall back tactic to disregard something someone says because that said something you didn't agree with. And what does being straight have to do with this?
It shows your failure to understand language. I wouldn't trust what someone who liked Inbetweeners US would say on TV shows, I don't take into account what you say on the use of language. As a straight person, I'm not going to take what you think I or any other LGBT folks should be offended at into account.
That's incredibly dishonest of you. You missed the point of what I was saying when discussed idioms mainly because you refuse to listen. Even if I didn't understand idioms, it doesn't mean that I can't make a valid point about something. Same with someone that liked a shitty TV show (I'm assuming it's shitty, but I've never heard of it). You're blocking of any opposition without hearing them out as if you can't deal with an opposing belief without being uppity or pissy.
Just because you're ambiguously gay doesn't mean that you can dictate how an entire community sees an offensive term.
I didn't, and it would hint at that. If someone likes a shitty TV show, their opinion in regards to TV shows are. I heard you out on this, and again it's a stupid opinion.
I've never met a gay guy who was offended by my use of the term faggot. There's been many cultural things like Louis CK and South Park that have addressed how this shift has taken place. You don't get to tell people what to be offended by. Words change.
Yes, Steve, ambiguously.
I've never personally met a black guy that was offended by my use of the words 'nigger', 'nigga', 'coon', etc. I bet if I were white they'd have a problem with it. It's likely a similar thing with you, Steve, since you probably exude an aura of sexual confusion, they accept you as one of their own. I've never met a gay guy that would be okay with me calling him a faggot, and this is with me living in a few different states. It's always the same. So it's safe to say that there are still people on the LGBT community that don't like that term (at the very least, don't like it being used outside their own community). So you saying that it's no longer offensive is wrong. You can't take your subjective experience and apply it to a whole community like that.
Alright, so I can say faggot, and you can't. Whatever, if that's the way you want to play it that's cool. Tell you what, I won't even call people coons or niggers.
Plus, people shouldn't be OK with you calling them faggot. It's an insult. They should be OK with you using the term.
Did you miss something or are you misrepresenting what I said?
Why should gays be okay with you saying something that insults gays?
Apparently, it's only insulting when straight people say it, just as apparently nigga is only insulting when white people say it. So I can say faggot all I want, you just can't.
Have you not heard of Uncle Ruckus?
So? Also, Clayton Bigsby.
You're just misrepresenting my argument.
My point was that it's more acceptable when said by someone in that community, doesn't make the term any less offensive. You display your homophobic attitude every time you use it.
More acceptable is less offensive, dipshit.
No it's not you self-hating, ambiguously gay, homophobe.
Don't hate myself, not ambiguous or gay, love gays.
You clearly hate yourself, Steve. Why else would act so homophobic amidst your sexual confusion?
Sure as shit not confused or homophobic.
I mean if you want to come to Ireland and witness me fuck a man, you can do that.
You could easily find a good friend that would agree to have sex with you to "prove" your homosexuality.
Alright, I'll fuck you, whatever. I'm just letting you know, it'll be a hatefuck.
How would fucking me prove you're gay?
Are you a dude? That'd be a good first step.
Anyhow, not gay. Bi or pan or whatever. Not bothered about labels, to be honest.
Yes, but the only thing you'd prove is that you're capable of rape (not that you'd be able to do anything to me if that was really you in that picture). Inmates, straight inmates rape each other all the time.
Well if you're coming here for the purpose of it, it's not rape. What evidence would suffice, Danaos?
You must fuck an attractive woman.
Alright, can do. Got one in mind, or...?
If you really are gay, you won't be able to get it up. Or maybe you just have some problems. Maybe you'll get past that part fine, but you'll feel really uncomfortable. Or maybe you'll enjoy yourself because you've been faking this whole time.
I feel I keep saying I'm not gay, but you're not hearing it. I'm bi or pan or whatever you want. Definitely a big fan of dicks, though.
We have been discussing your ambiguous homosexuality and only now you're telling me that you're pansexual?
No, I've said it earlier, you just don't pay attention.
You are disgusting.
Don't like pansexuals, huh?
Holy shit, this is even funnier than the commie thread. Lol.
Ever since 'nigger' was used by black protestors in the Civil Rights Movement as a form of protest in itself, that word has practically lost its original meaning. The fact that it's acceptable within black communities (and also outside of, from what I've seen) to call each other 'niggers' as a form of 'mateship' is a clear indication that, yes, the term has become less offensive. Just because a word is accepted within a community, doesn't mean the word has become less offensive, more offensive, or has remained as offensive. Looking at how the word is used determines that. When a white supremacist calls someone a nigger, that's offensive. When someone calls their friend a nigger, that's (probably) not offensive. This is entirely case-by-case, so a blanket statement like yours doesn't apply (that is, "it's more acceptable when said by someone in that community, doesn't make the term any less offensive").
Just chucking in my two cents.
Now I'm wondering if I should split this debate into its own thread or just change the title to "Memorial Day: Now with more Faggotry!"
EDIT: Split. Enjoy.
I'm getting all the threads this week. Gay shit, abortion shit, Communist shit, it's all good.
This gay thread is MINE.
Through your taking offense at the term faggot, I do agree that you are one.
If you're offended by the use of the term faggot, you are one. If you're offended to be called one, that's understandable.
Urban dictionary? Are you serious?
Also, this doesn't prove that this is more accepted than Webster's definition. Even if it did, there would still likely be a sizeable amount of people that find the term offensive. Thus, saying that it no longer has anything to do with gays isn't correct.
The only thing insulting is that winky face. Don't look at me like that. I'm a real man.
And that's not at all the point that I was making. You missed it almost entirely.
Well good. I'm glad we got that sorted.
Oh, I just noticed you used the term sociopath there, missed that earlier. Well, I guess I need to do this now.
Mr Kettle attempted to slink into his office, to hide his head in the sea of cubicles and slide right in without being noticed. Unfortunately, Mr Pot quickly noticed his employee, a snarl appearing on his face.
"What time do you call this, boy?!" he shouted.
"Sorry, sir. I know I'm late, but it's only by a few minutes, and I had to drop my kids to school! I won't let it happen again sir, I..."
"To school? You expect me to believe that, boy? God knows your kind don't go to school. Tell me, were you up too late last night playing craps, hmm? Listening to that godawful gangster rap, tagging signs?"
"My kind?" he asked in confusion, before hastily adding "Sir".
"Yes, your kind! The Negroids! Or as you hoodlums say on the street, the niggers!"
Mr Kettle felt a small bubble of anger form in him, but it was washed out by his confusion at the situation.
"Yes, sir, sorry sir, won't happen again," he said.
"Good! Now get to work!" Mr Pot yelled.
With that, Mr Kettle slunk away from the dark, almost ebony-skinned man in front of him to the safety of his cubicle.
And I still don't get why you people think I'm a sociopath.
Not playing Valk, we got a pro over here.
"A Gay Old Time"
Where do you come up with this? And the majority of this thread doesn't involve gay people.
It's almost as if he's referencing a time where Gay had a different meaning! But... meanings of words don't change, right?!
Now you're going back to your dishonest representation of what I said due to your own insecurity.
I never said words can't change, Steve.
What a dishonest representation! I never said you did! I simply acted confused!
I'm not buying your bullshit, Steve.
It's not for sale.
To me, this is the best exchange in the thread:
Steve: Alright, I'll fuck you, whatever. I'm just letting you know, it'll be a hatefuck.
Danaos: How would fucking me prove you're gay?
Steve: Are you a dude? That'd be a good first step.
It’s hilarious because despite hating him, Steve’s still up for fucking Danaos to prove a point.
Meanwhile Danaos isn’t so much concerned about getting fucked so much as he’s concerned with how that’s going to prove that Steve’s into dudes and Steve has to explain it to him.
Danaos seems more like a bottom.
Never told him to ban me, it was a simple miscommunication.
You heard me, did you? No, you read me saying it, you stupid whore.
It was a good joke, you should feel bad for stealing it.
I fail to see how the "Flintstones" has anything to do with this forum...care to explain?
"We'll have a gay old time."
Steve. Straight. lolololololol
I dare say I'm the most open and out of closet person here.
Pfffh, you're just a frigid bitch.
“Mizal, you're making a lot of very general statements that are both ignorant and offensive. Your bigoted opinion is not welcome here.” - Some CoGite faggot
I'm so late to this xD
(This is what I get for not being active >~> I miss all the funny stuff)
All I can say is, as long as it's Steve sayings it, I don't mind. (Mostly because that hedgehog he has as his profile picture just makes me forget why I was angry at him in the first place.)
After four days, did this contribute literally anything?
What is it?
Really? it super cute.
Strangely I can't see the pictures, but I'll take your word that it's more adorable ^_^
Edit: I saw them :O someone showed me a screenshot and omg that hedgehog is sooo adorable!
Well this seems pretty relevant to the thread.
This story has been nothing but grossly homophobic.
In almost every story branch, a gay character is either severally murdered, or is the main villain.
The company in the story is extremely homophobic. I could have excused that, because it made sense to the plot. But killing gay characters, just to kill them. Or making them out to be evil murderers, became too much. I really wouldn't ever read this story again, or anything else from this writer.
-- VenomBat on 6/10/2017 12:54:19 AM
Damn, now I'll never get to make this into a CoG.
To be fair, there's a shit ton of homophobia in the story. The protagonist isn't necessarily against it, he just gives like zero shits for others.
Pfft, The Ground Zero Corp and Nina are about the only two outwardly gay bashing entities in the story. And GZ is just amoral in general.
If I made a story where it’s saying “kill dem faggots hur hur hur!” and they’re getting tortured and killed on every page then someone might have a point.
Until then, it’s just overly sensitive poppets getting their panties in a twist as usual.
I kind of presumed the Ground Zero Corp spoke for the rest of society, seeing as we wouldn't put up with one company being outwardly homophobic if we weren't in a more homophobic time. Plus, the rest of the vault don't seem bothered when you're sending Ron away for loving the dick, so it seems like everyone either is gay, hates gays or is a violent sociopath.
GZ was more or less doing its own thing. Really, they just preferred straight people due to wanting them to breed. Gay people were going to pop up in the shelters regardless.
As for people just standing around doing nothing if you let the two gay dudes get punished, that’s mainly just the classic apathy in the face of injustice combined with Nina being a loud mouth and getting the dumb masses riled up.
The crowd easily goes back to not exiling them if you fuck Nina instead of going along with the crowd.
Yeah, I got that, but if you called up any company in a time like today and they said they'd only take gays, even if it was for practical reasons, that shit would not stand.
I presumed the crowd forgot about gays as they listened intently at the door to the rape, enjoying the sounds of straight things.
You don't rape Nina if you don't punish the gay dudes.
It's consensual since you kiss her instead of sending them to exile, and then she gets all hot and bothered for you and the pair of you go off together.
The path where you "rape" Nina is a different one.
Lol, thanks for that Morgan.
In any case, gotta love the fact they just ignored all the straight people getting killed in every story branch. And the only gay "villain" in the story was Miss Kitty in the Experimental Shelter branch, but hey let's ignore all the straight villains in the story too!
Fuck off, lesbians don't count. They're just confused bisexuals.
Well if lesbians don't count, then there aren't any gay villains at all and the story is even more progressive.
I'm fairly certain every one of the raider gangs were flaming homosexuals.
Didn't know you were counting "jailhouse gay" as part of your tribe.
I saw them more as rapey in general to anyone and everyone when they attacked the civilized settlements.
Everyone is part of my tribe, seeing as all of you are in the closet to some degree besides us bisexuals. None of you are straight, you're just all deluded.
Yeah, I see where you're going there, and I have attempted things under the "don't knock it 'till you try it" section just to see if I could correct my broke-ass self, or at least distract myself from the unhealthy parts, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way. In fact, I daresay I'm straighter now that I've witnessed all the gay shit on the internet than I was when the question was still up in the air. I'm pretty sure that sexuality goes one way or the other for most people. Some among us might have more wiggle room, but it doesn't work for us non-swingy people.
Suspending Jesus for homophobia is hilarious.
There's a thread where some of them think they have superpowers.
Ah, so this is the fabled CoG.
I have a question: This is a parody thread? Because, the manner very trollish. I didn't expect this behaviour, from well quailified writers, so I hope this is just a joke!
Sorry for the bad english, I'm not a native speaker!
Nope, it's not in the slightest.
This is so strange!
I read from you Mazkil, and don't remember any homophobic sentence, and the protagonist is an orc, not a SJW...
On the other hand, I think you are use a bit strong language, in this thread, not because the uninteresting homo thing, just the manner. (but no offense)
I read someone said Ground Zero homophobic too, but this is not true! First of all: Ground Zero is the best, or second best in this site, very well written! Of course, Endmaster have a unique style, which not everyone like, but a fact, that he is a good writer! Ground Zero have plenty violence lines, but this is not a fairy tale! GZ is play in a post-apocalypitc world, and the most charactet not good or bad, just want survive, the protagonist too!
I use the word "faggot" in a non-homophobic way. Like, when I say "You bastard!" I'm not insulting people whose parents never married. I am myself bisexual. I don't hate gays at all.
Fuck off, Blindy, speak for yourself. Steve is the greatest writer of all motherfucking time!
"You might be". I'll take it, that's going on the quote wall.
Haha, it's literally the only nice thing on there. The contrast is only testimony to your, er, skill.
Get back to me in 72.3% when you've something to compare my perfection to.
In 72.3%, not at. Which, given your total, would've led to 100%, you dumbass.
Idk what you're talking about.
Alright, publish it and I'll have a look.
Alright, here we go! Wait, what's that? Ah, right. Yeah, you're not going to believe this, but my agent just pulled the plug on the whole publication:/ No, really! I know it sounds like some big excuse but I was just about to click publish. Apparently it needs to be revised to proof-read for errors. What's that? Proof-read? Oh, I guess you're not really familiar with that concept. Nevermind then.
Look at this uppity cunt slinging shade. Anyhow, nothing to show, nothing to compare perfection to.
I'll be crawling through the forum archives in a few years once I finally publish my first (and probably only) story to bring this back up one day. Until then, fair enough.
All braille erotica, surprisingly.
Have you actually?
Edit: Legit novels in paper and the like?
Haha, no, dear god, no.
To be honest, if you are an actual author, then you probably wouldn't share your novels here. People could find out who you are if they really wanted and stuff you've said might come back to haunt you even if you meant it as a joke. It could all be taken out of context if some weirdo decided to do that. It's impressive if you do have four novels out there anyway.
This is truly not just a strange performance?
Pffh, find someone better. Shakespeare was a twat who used "And she went insane!" as a way to get rid of characters, Wilde wrote poetry like a faggot and Hemingyway was too much of a bitch to keep living.
Tests are hard and they make me sad.
Look on the bright side, you can only fail an AIDS test once.
Oh, I don't think the site have a lot good writers, but have, and I think Steve is good, thus strange this manner, from him.
George Orwell despised gays, and he was a great writer. I don't even hate them. Writers are assholes.
I REALLY don't care this gay thing, I just care manners.
Some writers have a bad personality, true, but this not a requirement.
And I don't think you are truly a troll, maybe just a bored person, why not write a good story instead, or read one?
Oh, that makes more sense. Then yes, I have no manners whatsoever, and don't care to get some. I enjoy my behaviour as a cunt. I find people who try to disguise what they say and their spiteful intentions with niceties rather than just say what they mean are retards who the human concept of language are wasted on.
Considering that June is gay pride month, this thread stands as an important acknowledgement of LGBT culture.
No it isn't.
And you're right, they should be proud of what they are...unless they're anything like Steve.
The fuck happened to the title?
"Face the reality."
- MinnieKing 2017
I'm pretty sure I've seen LGBTQA+ or I+ or something used. It seems to grow every day!
Hell, I’ve heard some heterosexually impaired folks argue that it should just be LGB and the rest of the letters should fuck off and start their own movements rather than latching on theirs.
Not a popular stance of course.
I think the whole thing is LGBTTQQAAIP.?
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual Transgender Queer Questioning Asexual Ally Intersex Pansexual
Lesbian and gay I get, but bisexuals aren't oppressed, and transgenderism is more of a condition than it is something like homosexuality. I thought queer was an insult to homosexuals (unless it's being used to mean 'gay' in which case it is redundant) and people that are questioning shouldn't be on this list. Asexuals aren't oppressed and I don't think they qualify to be on this list and having Ally is just pointless. Intersex is a mutation and pansexual are just people that can't control their disgusting urges. This is just getting out of hand.
Queer has to do with wanting androgyny for one or both participants in a relationship I think. Intersex also has stigma attached, so naturally they want a movement bUT there aren't really enough intersex people to make as big a noise as the LGBTOMGWTFBBQ can. Though I'm sort of confused as to why you're so okay with swinging one way but not multiple ways.
Because I find it disgusting. What about that is confusing? Pick a direction and go in it. Otherwise you're likely an amoral whore. Few exceptions (such as Alexander the Great, he was an accomplished man).
Alright, so just because Alexander was accomplished makes him not a whore? I don't follow. Accomplished people can be the biggest whores. That's what the Wolf of Wall Street was all about. Alexander the Great, and a lot of the bisexual Roman Emperors that followed him, had a lot of affairs with artists and actors and singers and other people who weren't very accomplished, and were probably the oldest examples of the Sugar Daddy known to mankind. Besides, we already know he was an unrepentant wino and an angry murderer as far as a morality goes, so the only thing excusing Alex from your judgement is the fact that you're an ancient mediterranean weeb. Meeb.
But yeah, I don't see how seeing two different genders attractive is any worse than say, finding all of one gender or the other attractive simply for being that gender. Having a larger pool to pick from (if it even is anyblarger, depending on preferences) doesn't make you a slut, having no standards makes you a slut.
Alexander wasn't a murderer.
Anyway, sticking it into a man then turning around and sticking it into a woman is nothing short of disgraceful. Bisexuals are to homosexuality as agnostics are to religion - indecisive, confused, fence sitters that think the 'middle' option is safe. Except in the case of people identifying as agnostic ignore the question entirely, pans and bisexuals answer it by fucking everything.
Oh, yeah, but everything else I said is just fine.
You say that as if somebody just walks into an orgy and does that for some reason. Bisexual people have relationships just like anyone else, and they can't help what they're attracted to. The fact of the matter is that they can just be attracted to either side.
And I don't consider myself an indecisive, confused fence sitter. It's not a 'Safe middle option', it's a valid stance in itself. I don't ignore the question, I acknowledge that it can't be fucking answered, and I haven't found any answers satisfactory to me. But that's not something that has anything to do with bisexuality, since that's also not "safe", nor a "middle option". It's a different choice in itself and has nothing to do with liking one or the other. Being attracted to a variety of people over both genders has no inherent difference from being attracted to a wide variety of people in general, and it's no different from hating a gay person for fucking the same gender or hating a straight person for fucking only the opposite one. It's a retarded thing to get hung up on.
Well, I wouldn't consider myself an "ancient Mediterranean weeb" either.
I'm not saying they can't have relationships, just that their sexuality makes no sense. I cannot fathom how one could look at a man and feel that kind of attraction then look at a woman and feel the same thing. Wouldn't being attracted to one or the other require your brain to be hardwired a certain way? It would be fair to say that bisexuality is a mental "problem" (for lack of a better word). However, I wouldn't even go that far. If it isn't some sort of malfunction in how the brain was supposed to develop, it's just someone that is very promiscuous and decided to slap a label on their experimentation.
A quotation on knowledge doesn't necessarily address one on belief that so-called agnostics ignore. It is a safe option since theists and atheists tolerate it more so than they do the other side. There is a difference when it comes to what makes one sex attracted to another or a sex attracted to its own kind. It's very different from hating homosexuals because I clearly don't hate homosexuals and I don't hate bisexuals for that matter.
But you are one, so it'it's fine.
It's not as hardwired as you might think. Some people can have a more negotiable position based on what they find attractive. Everyone looks for different kinds of things that have different appeal. Straight guys, for example, can like several different archetypes defined by their fashion, attitude, and looks. Just because someone's typical archetypes can be spread over multiple genders doesn't make it less hardwired, it just makes them hardwired to look for different things than what you understand. Not to mention all the mixing and matching that can occur when androgyny gets involved.
Well, I don't believe in anything I don't have knowledge to back up unless the thing in question is in a fictional world where conjecture was the basis for its existence in the first place. I don't believe in either side of the argument, but that doesn't mean that I'm ignoring the question, just that none of the answers presented are satisfying to me. Just because other people tolerate it is no fault of mine. Then please explain the difference, why don't you? And why bisexuals are disgusting and unfathomable whores to you, but you don't dislike them in some way for an equally inane reason?
And what makes you think so?
However "negociable" it may be, it ultimately comes down to them either being a male or female for both heterosexuals and homosexuals. People have preferences, yes, but they are hardwired to want one sex and not the other. Looking at our mind like a machine, it is nothing short of an error for a human to sexually desire both sexes when the appeals are completely different. What one sees in a man cannot be seen in a woman in the same fashion. This is why a homosexual or heterosexual will be almost immediately turned off if they find out their partner is the sex they didn't seem to be. Bisexuals don't experience this because faulty hardwiring. Again, this assuming that they have a problem with their programming and they're not just blatantly ignoring what they really are for reasons I've already stated.
It means you're evasive. No, it's not your fault, but it does make your choice the safe one. The difference being that homosexuality is far more legitimate. It makes more sense. Bisexuality is not, not in my eyes. I pity them that they aren't hardwired properly and are in denial - at least those who actually have that issue. Those that are just fucking everything in sight are whores by definition. Seeing someone as an irredeemable whore doesn't require hatred.
Are you capable of replying to any post of mine without being acting like a bitch?
Every post of mine that you reply to, no matter how benign the subject, invokes bitch-like behaviour from you. I'd say a little less than half is uncalled for. Anyhow, what makes you think I'm trolling? Hell, I typically don't troll until you walk in with that pole up your ass. I rarely ever joke about anything.
Because I wasn't even trolling this time. Also, you're comparing me to Steve. I'm nothing like Steve.
Pffh, you're too stupid to understand the difference between trolling and just being an argumentative asshole. The difference, for those interested, is sincerity.
I'm sort of running out of ways to take you seriously at the moment, but I'm pretty sure you're a Greeaboo, aND I'll argue this point instead because it'it's funnier. When a guy posts on forums and names himself Akira or Yunikawa Kakarushiru or Hory Shitu or whatever, has an anime profile, and posts stories about his samurai OC being seduced by some rich Japanese lady and fighting a man in the Period of Warring States, it's safe to say he's a weeb. So when a guy posts on forums and names himself Danaos or Sicarius or Latinus Greekerus or whatever, and his profile pictures are all paintings of Legionaries and barbarians and gladiators and all that Conan shit, and he posts stories about his gladiator OC being seduced by some rich Roman lady and fighting a man in the Arena, it's safe to say he's a meeb.
So me taking a liking to Greek and Roman history makes 'meeb'? Also, I've never posted anything about my OC being seduced by anyone. I don't think I've ever posted any story about my OC because I don't even have one (i'm assuming OC means original character). I think you're misusing the term.
Pretty much, yeah.
Wait a tick, Danaos isn't just some guy you made up?
Well that's a load of crap.
No, sir. Danaos is a name taken from a video game I played on my PSP when I was younger. The game was called "Gladiator Begins" and Danaos was the top gladiator you could face if you chose to go that route instead of following the story. The profile pic is an image of Danaos. I picked the name because he was my favorite gladiator in the game. Also, Danaus is apparently some Greek mythology but I don't know anything about him.
Keeping with the theme of my profile, my new username is Sicarius. I learned about the Sicarii when I was watching a documentary on ancient assassins. I'd expand more on what they are, but the description is already on my profile pic.
Yeah, this makes sense. I get liking blondes, and I get liking brunettes, but liking both? Fuck off, you pussy, go ahead and commit to a hair color. Goddamn freaks thinking its OK to like both.
Terrible analogy. A blonde and brunette can have only hair color as being the trait that sets them apart. Not a different set of genitalia.
Well who really cares about a different set of genitalia. I mean, you're not walking about with those hanging out. But hair? That shits constantly on display. Only fucking weird perverts are into BOTH blondes and brunettes. Get off the fence and pick a hair colour, you fucking faggots.
That's what I'm saying! Anyone attracted to more than one hair color is a freak to be disposed of.
Bisexuals in the past probably got more shit from the gay crowd, since there was this weird idea that bisexuals didn't really exist, they were just gay people still in denial about who they really were.
(And intolerant straight folks just lump them in with the gays since they're all just different shades of the same degenerate as far as they're concerned)
Also there tends to be a stigma that bisexuals are just fucking everything in sight like degenerates and don't even understand the concept of monogamy...though Steve doesn't exactly dispel that perception.
Bisexuals get way more shit than filthy homosexuals. I presume because they're jealous, or it's like when closeted homosexuals are super homophobic.
Man, the Jews can’t catch a break.
TL;DR - Some snowflakes got triggered by the gay Jews waving around a rainbow colored Star of David flag.
So much for the Dyke March (No, really that’s what it’s called) being inclusive. Lol.
Jews are famous for killing homosexuals, the fuckers. Look at Jesus, they fucking crucified the man. I sure as shit wouldn't feel safe with Jews about. Last thing I'll see is them stringing me up to a cross yelling about lying with men as one does women. Keep them out, I say.
I'll just put this here for sake of civilized and adult discussion:
TRUTH OR BULLdoodie, YOU DECIDE!
Also, this: TROUBLE IN KEKISTAN!
Okay, now discuss.
Well shit, wish some of these Orthodox Jews came to me with bags of money just to stand around with anti-gay signs. I mean getting paid to troll, doesn’t get much better than that.
As for the Alex Jones link: Lol. Never actually watched that guy before, just heard stuff about him.
It's always best to investigate things for yourself. (An aside: I loathe posting anything from TYT, so I had to be balanced in my post. Jones is the perfect solution to it, even though I much prefer Icke for the gay-lizardmen-cannibals-from-outer-space stuff, however most of it is too technical for a site like this - not the link here, but some of his 5 hour videos of the subject.)
Saw the faggot frogs thing a while back, apparently the chemical mumbo jumbo performs some voodoo judoo that does affect how frogs behave.
idk, it's alex jones so whatevs
I call them FROGGATS myself though...
From what I recall, it was a bi-product of the chemical hocus pocus. Don't think anyone was specifically paying to make the frogs gay.
Yeah, pretty sure it was the chemicals being dumped in the water that were being used to make something else. They were really trying to make the people gay through chem trails. For population control and just to make the world a bit perkier.
I think the agenda wasn't so much that the Chemtrails would make people gay, this was just to show that so called "Transexuals" were actually brainwashed by the liberluminati and their job is to make everyone sexually dysfunctional with their poorly-disposed-of hormone supplements so that only the left wing can reproduce.
Or, at least I like to pretend he's pushing a completely different bigger picture every time. It's funnier that way, less sad to listen to.
I'm not really a faggot, I'd just let Tom Hardy fuck me.