Well what I did for my language was I constructed an entire history and culture for the civilization, and then made the language. It's easier when you have a foundation and can derive a sound of the language from the history and culture. It's all over-analyzation. lol I've made quite a comprehensive history, going back to the society's origin when the first people settled down in a remote valley in the Caucasus mountains, to an alternate World War 2 where Nazi Germany invaded in 1942 and then this society fought alongside Russia when pushing back to Berlin. And then after WW2, the Russians wanted the civilization to join the USSR, but the government of the civilization was like a feudalistic republic - families were the political parties and ruled as separate states that convened in the intertribal congress - so they didn't want Communism, which eventually led to a revolution in 1982 that split the families between the Republicans and the Communists. After the Communists were defeated, the families were banished into the surrounding mountains of the Caucasuses, as most defeated and shamed families were forced to do. The civilization caught flak from the UN over violating some code or something, but did not let the families return. The families settled in nearby countries, mostly in the USSR. After the Cold War ended, the families either remained in their countries or tried to return, and even to this day, there is controversy over letting the families back in.
Yeah, so that's a basic history of the civilization. And no, I don't have a name for it yet. lol
As for the language being influenced by the history and culture, the grammar is very structural and uncompromising, but at least it's simple and pragmatic. There's no conjugation other than tenses, nouns are indicated as direct object or subject, and there are indicator articles that go in-between nouns and their adjectives. For example:
"The little boy happily flies his big, yellow kyte in the sky."
"De-Cilu-e-natce et-Kayt-e-ganzce-e-lufce zoruwa yoi-Zortziyu"
(literally) "[Subject]-Boy-[adjective marker]-little [direct object]-Kyte-[adjective marker]-big-[adjective marker]-yellow flies [having to do with]-Sky.
So the language follows 'Subject - Direct Object - Verb' and the "yoi-" is essentially an adjective marker that shows the following word is related to the rest of the sentence, but is not involved with the base S-DO-V setup. The "wa" at the end of "zoruwa" indicates it's a verb and is in the present tense.
Also, "e" makes a 'schwa' or 'ah' sound (depends on dialect; 'ah' is royal, 'schwa' is more common), "c" makes the 'sh' sound, and "a" makes the 'ai' (eye) sound.