Non-threaded

Forums » The Lounge » Read Thread

A place to sit back, hang out, and make monkey noises about anything you'd like.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
So fighting and killing is okay in your worldview, but intercourse is off the table?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Yes, although I don't support fights or killing in real life other than the obvious stuff like war

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
So which is worse in the real world, taking a life or having homosexual intercourse outside of marriage?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
You'll have to wait on the full answer for this question. I cannot look up the verses I want to answer this question as of right now. I could give you the short answer though:

Both are terrible, especially when you compare it what the Bible says about those things. Murder is much worse because you are taking the life of someone away, where as Homo intercourse is a terrible sin that defiles the body God gave you.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I'm interested in the verse where Jesus said that when you get a chance to look it up though.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Bible only makes reference to male-male homosexuality, is lesbo tribbing okay? 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I can't imagine a good God who doesn't support that. (remembers to delete browsing history)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
wow. I think this comment is also obvious and goes with what I said earlier, God does not support this

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
It applies to both Men and Women. So no

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

The prohibition, both in Leviticus and its re-formulation in the New Testament, both use gendered language to refer to the act on male on male sex acts. How are you determining that lesbianism is prohibited? 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
homosexuality reefers to both man/man and woman/woman. Plus, God made man to be with women, not man with man or woman with woman
1 Corinthians 7:2-5 nlt But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
You're wrong about the word meaning, but yeah, I think it's best that you personally just continue thinking sex is icky.

1 Corinthians is also, incidentally, where it says it's better not to marry at all.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I thought it meant being attracted to the same sex? And yes, it would be better not to marry, with the main reason being self-control. It also said in 1 Corinthians 7: "It’s better to marry than to burn with lust."

Matthew 19 1-12

When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went down to the region of Judea east of the Jordan River. Large crowds followed him there, and he healed their sick.

Some Pharisees came and tried to trap him with this question: “Should a man be allowed to divorce his wife for just any reason?”

“Haven’t you read the Scriptures?” Jesus replied. “They record that from the beginning ‘God made them male and female.’" And he said, “‘This explains why a man leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united into one.’ Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together.”

“Then why did Moses say in the law that a man could give his wife a written notice of divorce and send her away?” they asked.

Jesus replied, “Moses permitted divorce only as a concession to your hard hearts, but it was not what God had originally intended. And I tell you this, whoever divorces his wife and marries someone else commits adultery—unless his wife has been unfaithful.”

Jesus’ disciples then said to him, “If this is the case, it is better not to marry!”

“Not everyone can accept this statement,” Jesus said. “Only those whom God helps. 12 Some are born as eunuchs, some have been made eunuchs by others, and some choose not to marry for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.”

Hebrew 13:4 nlt

Give honor to marriage, and remain faithful to one another in marriage. God will surely judge people who are immoral and those who commit adultery.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

1 Corinthians 7-2 contains advice on how to avoid porneia, a Greek word that means improper sexuality: incest, adultery, the like. It's closely related to the feminine Greek noun porne, which means (a normatively female) prostitute. Given as St. Paul (and 1 and 2 Corinthians are considered authentic Pauline writings) is writing to Greeks living in Corinth, and giving advice to married people,  he's clearly talking about avoiding heterosexual relations outside of marriage. 

This puts Paul in line with other ancient Mediterranean writers, who largely did not describe female homosexuality. Whether they did not care, or did not have sufficient insight into the private lives of women to know it happens, is unclear. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

Guess I'll throw my hat into the ring here:

“For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭1‬:‭26‬-‭27‬ ‭NKJV‬‬
https://bible.com/bible/114/rom.1.26-27.NKJV

Thoughts from the language experts on these verses?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Amazing, one of the Super Christians finally remembered this passage existed. This was brought up in the Discord, wondering why Blister was working himself up into a frenzy over the word "homosexual" and skipping the only actual potential reference to lesbians.

Especially when his NLT just straight up says, "That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other." which is not at all what most other translations say.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

I was surprised this one wasn't mentioned already. Probably one of the strongest arguments for the Bible decrying homosexuality for both the sexes. Had to do some back reading here to confirm.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Might be worth mentioning that Paul was also pretty against acting on heterosexual urges.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Double post sorry meant to edit lmao

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Yeah, but it doesn't EXPLICITLY say women with women in NKJV, like it does men with men. Maybe God is referring to Ol' Betsy, the mechanical man beside the bed? And since it says, "likewise for men, leaving their natural use of women," perhaps that means that, like men, women also left their natural use of women? NASB and ESV likewise (heh) have similar ambiguity. I mean, sure, it probably means likewise in the sense that women to women and men to men, but based on these translations, it's also possible to interpret it as men giving up women the same way women gave up women. \_(o_0)_b

Of course, NLT, but then, is it a literal translation?

EDIT: Also hetero butt sex.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
I literally looked up verses that talked about "homosexuality" along with "gay" and "lesbian", and this one did not come up once, no matter what translation I looked it up in. But I guess it proves my point, even if I was not the one to use this verse: "Homosexuality is wrong"

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

Here I'm most sympathetic to James E Miller's argument that in Classical writing, male and female homosexuality weren't considered as natural rhetorical pairs to each other: we think of "gay" and "lesbian" as sort of associated concepts in modernity, but that was not the case in antiquity. Miller argues that women exchanging their natural use is a reference to non-procreative penetrative sex acts, i.e. oral and anal intercourse, which seems to have been a relatively common occurrence in Greco-Roman antiquity. It's also worth noting that Paul was writing to the Romans, who Miller notes had a robust culture of contraceptive use, including a possible use of anal penetration to avoid pregnancy. And again, summarizing the article, discussion of female anal penetration alongside discussion of male homosexuality is more common than discussion of female homosexuality alongside male homosexuality in antique writing. 

Miller, James E. “The Practices of Romans 1:26: Homosexual or Heterosexual?” Novum Testamentum 37, no. 1 (1995): 1–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561233.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

Thanks for the reference. Once again, I wish I had an account to access JSTOR texts.

I saw a recent paper from my Alma Mater (UMW) that actually references the document you shared. it does a bring up a good point with context. I suppose it is hasty to read the document with a modern lease of pairing gay and lesbian. However, Paul does decry any form of sexual activity outside of marriage (referencing back to his letter to the Corinthians that chronologically would have been written earlier), and it's not as if the church or even Roman culture is sanctioning female-to-female marriages.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Even marriage he was very grudging about, he only approved it if was a genuine necessity. I kind of feel like that was his personal bias creeping in in that case, though I do wish Blister's parents had heeded the suggestion of remaining unmarried and celibate.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
I've realized I probably am gay after all.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

When are we getting IP bans on this site?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

Yeah I've been wondering that myself. For a long time the default response from the old admins was that they're trivially bypassed, but I think they'd go a long way to deterring low effort imbecile spammers 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Wait, really? Wow, what a turnaround lol. Well good for you for coming to terms with it.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
I bet he could've written a really cool Thunderdome story about it if he hadn't been so busy getting ready for his trip this weekend he had no extra time.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Well Mizal the priblem is that I've realized I'm retarded as well.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
LMAO well played. Next time use the right avatar though (assuming you didn't and lost it upon banishment).

EDIT: wait, is this the real Blister? I thought it was a clever troll by Harper and/or Bezro.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago

Yeah, I agree with that statement. I'm sure Paul wouldn't approve of female-female sexual couplings of any description, but I don't think they would be particularly on his radar. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Hail Satan

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Woah, Blister. What would Jesus think if he read that?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

19 days ago
What's up?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
So like I was saying

Murder:
Genesis 9:5-6 nlt
And I will require the blood of anyone who takes another person's life. If a wild animal kills a person, it must die. And anyone who murders a fellow human must die. If anyone takes a human life, that person's life will also be taken by human hands. For God made human beings in his own image.



Homosexuality:

homosexuality refers to both man/man and woman/woman. Plus, God made man to be with women, not man with man or woman with woman

1 Corinthians 7:2-5 nlt But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

Leviticus 18:22 nlt
Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.

Also you can read 1 Corinthians 7 nlt for instructions on marriage if you really are interested in reading what the Bible says about this

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I say we stop here with this on the threads. message me if you want more info on this

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
There now, we have a whole new thread for you gays to keep going in.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Thanks for the thread. I wish there was a way to hide this from the home page for the younger writers, Avo messaged me about it so I had to apologize to her.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

I think there are worse things on this site than a debate about homosexuality. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
True, but I don't want to be the one introducing it to someone young who does not know what it is

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

You're actually very lucky to have stumbled upon this site rather than CoG. (AKA Choice of Games)

That site is basically Sodom where they do nothing but celebrate homosexuality and degeneracy of swapping out your man parts for a lesser model. Along with dressing up in fursuits and wearing diapers. Worse still, they push this ideology on children.

So actually you probably should continue spreading the cause of righteousness so that the youth here may see it and not be swayed by evil.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Thanks

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Introducing what? The concept of The Gay? The Bible itself?

The regular users of the site aren't going to walk on eggshells because kids might be around, if the kids are here it's up to them to use their own judgement. But even in a strictly PG conversation this is not a scary topic that needs to be spoken of in hushed tones.


Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
If they're both sins, would you have a train run on you (this means multiple of them taking turns (homosexually)) by big black crossdressers (they are not passing) if it would prevent the Holocaust?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

@Blister1

Reminder that the Holocaust was really bad

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Yes, thanks for the reminder anyways :D

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Dammit Sherb, I thought at least you were based.

The answer to "How many Jews died in the holocaust" will forever be "not enough".

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Notice how this was never answered...

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
It's not even six million big black men, Petros was being very generous.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Nobody here is a Hebrew priest so I'm not sure there's much to the argument that Leviticus applies here. Or why this specific verse does but not the rest.

>>homosexuality refers to both man/man and woman/woman.

You also are conveniently changing the meaning of what the Bible actually says to fit your personal belief, which is poor form in a debate.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Even so, you would still apply it to both. Also, I'm no bible scholar, so I might make a few mistakes when it comes to certain things that I have not been taught a ton on

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Malk mentioned the specific wording used though. The issue here is that you keep going back to the word "homosexuality" itself which doesn't even appear in most English translations, and putting a meaning on it that was not the intent of the original author.

I'm interested if he knows any details about Lev 18:22 though since that one is also apparently linguistically interesting in context.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
From what I know, that verse can also be interpreted as 'don't sleep with children as you'd sleep with an adult' this is quite a contentious subject, though.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Yeah, pretty much everything in Leviticus afaik is very specifically addressing issues in that culture, and there's a lot devoted to incest with that potentially being one of them because of some specific word only appearing one other time and used in that context.

Malk really has to be the guy for these questions though, I don't know anyone else with relevant degrees.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Ok, I'll address that question with that context in mind. I think I was still trying to answer both Petros and Malk's questions at the same time. Also I used Lev 18:22 in my answer to one of them

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Uhhhh. Ever heard of the Ten Commandments? 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Yep, those too play a part in this

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Of course he has, they have been placed by law in every classroom in his state.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I was surprised when I found that out. I think it is cool since we can't really talk too much about religion we can in history a little and I was able to talk about my trip to Mexico I'll be on to my teachers, we just can't debate or bring it up in lessons during class, or something like that

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Okay, that's great for you personally, but what if instead the mandatory poster said, "Allah is the only God, and Muhammad is his prophet"?

A public school is meant as a neutral place for everyone to learn without having one belief system or another forced on them, it's part of the whole equality and freedom and respect for everyone under the same law thing that America allegedly was supposed to be about at one point.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I don't see how it is being forced, it's not like we go over them in class and there aren't signs saying something like : "You can only practice Christianity in schools and no other religion."

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Maybe not yet, but if the tenants of one faith are the only ones presented, even if they are officially reviewed by the teacher, implies that other faiths are not as welcome. It also provides fodder for disingenuous arguments by Christian nationalists.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Those are big words, but I think I understand.

It has sparked conversations between me and my classmates about remembering the Ten Commandments.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

You clearly do not lol. 

That's nice that it has sparked conversations, but that's really not the point here. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Equal representation is such an important thing, especially for kids. It's so easy to see things like Christianity being favored and feel alone or like you/your religion is worse or lesser than others. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

What the fuck?! Separation of church and state. I don't care if Congressmen and Governors go to Mass, Synagogue, or Mosque. Hell, if they wanna do a quick "Hail Satan!" before they begin voting on issues, I dislike it on a personal feelings level, but I respect it as part of the First Amendment.

But unless we're adding the Six Paths of Buddha and the Five Pillars of Islam to the classroom, the Ten Commandments shouldn't be included either.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Well, "In God We Trust" is the national motto of the United States

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't one of the main reasons that people sailed to the Americas from Britan to escape religious persecution? The United States should be a place where people are free to practice any religion. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
They are free to practice any religion, there are no laws against religion that I know of, but posting the Ten Commandments on every wall in every room in school's does not violate the practice of religion.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

As Mizal has already pointed out in her response, it is unconstitutional for the government to establish a practice favoring a religion. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
See my post a little above this. You know very well if it was something from a religion you disagreed with you'd be singing a different tune and/or crying like a bitch lol.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That's just what goes on the god called Money.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

And? I seem to recall Jesus stating "Render onto Caesar what is Caesar's" when the issue of Pagan engravings on coins was brought to his attention by Pharisees. It's pretty clear that what mankind chooses to write down on their currency is irrelevant and that dedicating the self to God is infinitely more important. 

I would also like to state that "In God We Trust" is a motto. Court rulings have already established that a motto has no bearing on government practice, after people sued the police for not intervening when civilians were in danger despite their motto being "Protect and Serve."

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
that "quote" is found in Matthew 22, Mark 12, and Luke 20, where he teaches that people should pay taxes and fulfill their civic duties to the government (the "Caesar") while also giving their devotion and obedience to God. The phrase highlights the separation of church and state, acknowledging that while civil authority has legitimate claims, God's authority is supreme, and the things that belong to God—like human beings created in His image—should be dedicated to Him

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

And money belongs to the government. Not to God. So the phrasing on the dollar bill saying "In God We Trust" would not be an argument against the separation of Church and State. By your own acknowledgment, that verse is a statement from Jesus himself on the fact that the state and the church are not one and the same.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Well after looking some of this up I seem to understand some of this better.
I found some of this to be helpful in my understanding:

Government Neutrality: The government cannot endorse, support, or interfere with religious institutions or practices.

Religious Freedom: The state cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion.

No Official Religion: The United States does not have a state-sponsored religion.

Distinct Roles: The government is responsible for civil matters, while religious institutions manage spiritual and moral affairs.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Yes.

Believe it or not, they used to teach these things in school.

You guys are all just being primed to be dumb and complacent I'm pretty sure. You might get a better sense of that in a few years when you notice how many kids in elementary school now will reaching adulthood without even being able to read enough to look things up this way.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Do you think the government passing a law requiring schools to put up the Ten Commandments would be a violation of government neutrality in regards to supporting religious practice?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
When looking the law up, I found this to be helpful. I can see and understand why this would be a violation of government neutrality and supporting religious practice

Legal and Constitutional Issues

First Amendment Violation: Critics, including the ACLU, argue the law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits government establishment of religion.

Stone v. Graham: Opponents point to the Supreme Court's 1980 ruling in Stone v. Graham, which found a similar Kentucky law unconstitutional.

Ongoing Lawsuits: Lawsuits have been filed to block the law, with some federal courts issuing injunctions against its implementation.

Parental Rights: Some parents express concern that the law infringes on their parental rights to instill their own beliefs in their children.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Yeah, many Christians have been pushing against the separation of church and state since the very beginning. The original motto of "E Pluribus Unum" is much more fitting for the ideals of the nation.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Not all of us. A lot of Christians who can see past the end of their noses understand that compelling people to practice Christianity will just lead to less Christians in the long run. Jesus never made anyone follow him. And since Christian means "like Christ" we shouldn't either. I've also heard Christians bring up Salem and the European Witch Trials as an example of what happens when the government gets involved in religion. Had the judges wrote back the people of Salem saying "No, you cannot kill and imprison people because you think they are committing a sin." instead of using their government-appointed judicial power to legitimize the paranoia in collaboration with the Church, many people would still be alive and fewer families would have been ripped apart and forced into penury.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
r/TexasTeachers has been popping up in my feed alot since this happened, plenty of Christians recognize this as a terrible idea and sure to go to shit just like everything the government touches.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
What do you mean "many Christians have been pushing against the separation of church and state since the very beginning."? I don't know what you have been told or read, but The church I go to does not support this but the opposite. We go to all kinds of countries to spread Christianity. Maybe I just don't understand half of the stuff y'all are saying, especially with y'all giving me all kinds of angles, topics, and questions right now that it is getting harder to understand

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state

This is a grade school concept. In the generation before yours, 5th graders learned about the Bill of Rights.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That happened to be one of the hardest things for me to learn, even in 8th grade, along with the Constitiution

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

I'm pretty sure I'm the same generation as him (at least I'm assuming he's a highschooler) and where I live we did get a pretty good education about stuff like this. Even if you live in a area where it's not taught in schools, it's super easy with the internet now to do some research and learn about things. The internet is especially cool because you get to see arguments from all sides. 

Blister, you should really do some research about these things. Understanding your government is a pretty important thing, especially if they've stopped teaching it in schools now. (I don't know what's going on in public schools anymore because my parents moved me to private school.)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I'm also fairly sure I'm in the same generation, my area also got a fairly good education regarding this. I live in a region considered by most to be pretty 'conservative' as well.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Half of the houses where I live fly the confederate flag lol. I'm just glad that I switched to a private education as soon as the public schools in my area started getting weird about politics. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

He's saying a lot of Christians are for the state favoring Christianity over all other religions, making it the "official" religion of the US in law, basing laws on what the Bible says, ect.

Technically he's not wrong, but many Christians have also been opposed to compulsory conversion as well. And as for the angles, have you tried taking a deep breath after some thought and addressing the statements one at a time rather than answering quickly and possibly not understanding what's being said? There's not a timer on this forum.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
doesn't compulsory conversion include forcing or under duress often through threats of violence, expulsion, or other negative consequences?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

It would. Like Antraxus said, many Christians have been for that by passing laws that are based off Bible Scripture, which would in practice lead to incarceration for anyone who does not practice Bible teachings.

As I've pointed out, a lot of Christians think that would cause people to either rebel against Christ, or else obey him out of fear of consequences rather than genuine faith.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Yeah, it's pretty illegal. And functionally is really just going to breed the natural resentment that people have for a thing that's forced upon them.

Ten Commandments is just another empty gesture meant to keep a specific subset of voters happy anyway, the government would be terrified if kids were exposed to any of Jesus's actual teachings. The bright side here is there will be more learning about the Constitution and Bill of Rights now since a lot of teachers are putting topical quotes up next to their mandatory Jew poster.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Commended by Mizal on 9/30/2025 8:13:40 PM
I want a campaign for Trump to sell everything he has and give the money to the poor

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Just thinking about homosexual intercourse makes you a homo in your heart.

But I think as long as you kill the other guy when you're done, these actions cancel each other out.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I don't think that quite works, but either way you should commend this comment for getting my water all over my screen.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
lol

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That is two terrible sins, so they would not cancel out but only make things worse.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

This is very true.  Two wrongs do not make a right.  But since three lefts make a right, you would need to add at least one more act to turn it right.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Hi I'm The Gay, heard you needed some questions answered - ask away! 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Are you Boy The Gay or Girl The Gay?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

I am the one that is apparently a sin in the bible, not the other one that isnt 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

So a boy then?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I hope you're not here to tell Blister about that time you slept with his dad, I thought you agreed not to mention that.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Well, I didnt plan to!

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That's pretty American tbf.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Blister, what would you do if you saw two gay men kissing in public?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Look away. If I knew them I would confront them individually later

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
What if you see your two best friends making out in public, in fact, in the middle of a youth group session as an act of protest?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I would definitely confront them. None of my best friends are anywhere near the kind to protest something in this way, especially not against the church. All my best friends are those who pursue God the best they can.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Well, while the Bible does say you can confront your fellow Christians, you should do so only if you are not also guilty of what you're condemning them for. Example, I would not confront them as I also engage in homosexual activity from time to time. Or to paraphrase a bible verse, take the beam out of your own eye before you remove the speck in yours.

Based on how you feel about it, I would say you're not any type of homosexual. I would like to state that murder is significantly worse than intercourse and homosexuality for a few reasons.

One: You're literally ending a person's life. There's a reason why Cain got such a significant punishment and why at the end of days the martyrs will be calling on God to avenge their blood. To take a life that God has created is literally destroying his work and hurting countless people. We are supposed to comfort those who grieve, not inflict grief on them.

Two: When the prostitutute in the temple was to be stoned for intercourse, Jesus said "Let whosoever is without sin cast the first stone." All he said to her was to "Go and sin no more." While intercourse outside of marriage is a sin, consider the fact that only one of the two caused direct admonishment from Jesus.

Three: This last part is not exactly biblical, but it still pertains to morality. Every society that progressed past the point of "Let us not shit in the same pond we draw water from" has agreed that murder is bad. While homosexuality has had mixed reactions. Murder has such a negative effect on the human soul and psyche, more than any other crime has been shown to. There is a very good reason why killing someone is seen as a loss of humanity and innocence. Because it is. It is such a horrendous act that it impacts your very soul in the worst way possible, and doing it repeatedly will render you an unfeeling shell. Plenty of people can have intercourse before marriage or either someone of the same gender and remain largely the same person they were before. Only the most emotionless, deranged individuals can kill without remorse.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I agree. I'm only answering their questions as of now.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I'll try to clear everything up in one big response so we don't have to bounce from different lines in this thread. Give me a sec to put it all together. my current response I currently full of all of these :“ due to me copy and pasting verses so it is taking a while.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
Time to clear up on the original questions.

I am not a Bible scholar yet, so I probably am not THE best person to ask, but i'll use my knowledge. I will be restating a lot of what I said earlier along with the same or similar Bible verses, so feel free to skip over the Bible verses if you don't want to re-read them.

I do have like 5 different topics covered here and it looks like a mess to be honest.


As to answer Petros question: Both taking a life or having homosexual intercourse outside of marriage are terrible, especially when you compare it what the Bible says about those things. Murder is much worse because you are taking the life of someone away, where as Homo intercourse is a terrible sin that defiles the body God gave you. God made man to be with women, not man with man or woman with woman.

Murder:
Genesis 9:5-6 nlt
"And I will require the blood of anyone who takes another person's life. If a wild animal kills a person, it must die. And anyone who murders a fellow human must die. If anyone takes a human life, that person's life will also be taken by human hands. For God made human beings in his own image."

I hope this helps both Petros question and Malk's questions along with anyone else who has questions regarding homosexuality and marriage:

Homosexuality:

Leviticus 18:22 nlt

"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin."

Marriage:

1 Corinthians 7:2-5 nlt

"But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control."

It also would be better not to marry, with the main reason being self-control as stated in 1 Corinthians 7

Here are some other verses I hope help:

Matthew 19 1-12

When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went down to the region of Judea east of the Jordan River. Large crowds followed him there, and he healed their sick.

Some Pharisees came and tried to trap him with this question: "Should a man be allowed to divorce his wife for just any reason?"

"Havent you read the Scriptures?" Jesus replied. "They record that from the beginning God made them male and female. And he said, This explains why a man leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united into one. Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together."

"Then why did Moses say in the law that a man could give his wife a written notice of divorce and send her away? they asked.

Jesus replied, "Moses permitted divorce only as a concession to your hard hearts, but it was not what God had originally intended. And I tell you this, whoever divorces his wife and marries someone else commits adultery,unless his wife has been unfaithful."
Jesus disciples then said to him, If this is the case, it is better not to marry!"

"Not everyone can accept this statement," Jesus said. "Only those whom God helps. Some are born as eunuchs, some have been made eunuchs by others, and some choose not to marry for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. Let anyone accept this who can."

And also in Hebrew 13:4 nlt

"Give honor to marriage, and remain faithful to one another in marriage. God will surely judge people who are immoral and those who commit adultery."

Honoring man and woman or husband and wife:

Deuteronomy 22:25-27

“But if the man meets the engaged woman out in the country, and he rapes her, then only the man must die. Do nothing to the young woman; she has committed no crime worthy of death. She is as innocent as a murder victim. Since the man raped her out in the country, it must be assumed that she screamed, but there was no one to rescue her. "

Ephesians 5:28-29 28

"In the same way, husbands ought to love their wives as they love their own bodies. For a man who loves his wife actually shows love for himself. No one hates his own body but feeds and cares for it, just as Christ cares for the church."

Colossians 3:19

"Husbands, love your wives and never treat them harshly. In the same way, you husbands must give honor to your wives. Treat your wife with understanding as you live together. She may be weaker than you are, but she is your equal partner in God’s gift of new life. Treat her as you should so your prayers will not be hindered."

1 Peter 3:7

"In the same way, you husbands must give honor to your wives. Treat your wife with understanding as you live together. She may be weaker than you are, but she is your equal partner in God’s gift of new life. Treat her as you should so your prayers will not be hindered."


Ephesians 5:28-29 and Colossians 3:19 instruct husbands to treat their wives with self-sacrificing love and kindness, rather than harshness, and 1 Peter 3:7 urges husbands to give honor and live with understanding toward their wives. Disrespectful and harsh treatment is condemned as contrary to these divine commands.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

⁠Leviticus 20:13 ESV:

"A man who lays with another man should be stoned."

So being gay and having gay sex is fine as long as you're high, checkmate. 

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
Please don't ever play with the words in the Bible. I find it highly insulting

The Bible consistently warns against changing God's word, with explicit passages in Deuteronomy 4:2 and Revelation 22:18-19 stating that adding to or taking away from God's commandments and prophecies will result in divine rebuke, loss of reward, and exclusion from eternal life. Various other verses also emphasize the integrity and unchanging nature of God's word, stressing the importance of handling it with reverence and not distorting it to fit personal interpretations or traditions

Human Responsibility: Believers are instructed to obey and carefully handle God's word, not to alter it to fit changing societal views or personal interpretations. (even if you don't believe)

Consequences of Distortion: The Bible teaches that distorting God's Word, whether by addition, subtraction, or misinterpretation, is a serious offense with severe spiritual consequences.

Deuteronomy 4:2:

"You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you".

Proverbs 30:5-6:

"Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar".

Revelation 22:18-19:

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. 19 And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll."

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
Going by this the fact the Bible is in English at all is sinful as hell.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
What do you mean?

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

When you translate things from another language, you're changing the text. Every translation is going to have slightly different meaning depending on the individual who interpreted it. It's impossible to have a completely unchanged translation of something. That's why when two different people translate the same text, you will come out with slightly different meanings or words that impact the text on a whole in a large scale. 

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
I still don't get the "sinful" part, why is it bad that it is in English?

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

You said that changing or altering the words of the bible is sinful. Translation does just that. 

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
translations are based off of Greek, Latin, and Hebrew words, they are different translations, not altercations

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
Often the translations convert phrases instead of words and do so with ill-concealed preconceptions and biases

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
No, I'm done with this

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
Commended by EndMaster on 9/30/2025 9:08:24 PM
You are the blackest most retarded gorilla nigger I have ever witnessed on the internet.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

Did you actually read my previous response or just skim it? Languages don't have exact translations for words because they're different languages. Depending on how the translator translates it, it will alter the meaning of the text. 

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
I have re-read most of yalls responses multiple times. The verse still has the same meaning, they're just worded differently allowing people to choose the one that makes the most sense to them. A lot of people I know go back and forth between translations when they're studying the Bible.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. 19 And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll."

Now you're contradicting yourself. This says that the adding or subtracting of words is sinful. When you translate, you're going to have to add or subtract words. Even if you get the connotation of every word exactly as was intended in the original language, going off of this logic, translating the bible would still be sinful. 

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
That verse in Revelation is explicitly about the book of Revelation anyway, I'm assuming he just grabbed it from ChatGPT along with the others, because it really makes no sense in his context of applying it the rest of the Bible. (Which didn't even exist.)

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

As somebody who has never read the bible, (I probably should, it's a good historical text and it's always interesting/worthwhile to delve into religions) the holes in his arguments were embarrassingly apparent. I feel bad for any future teachers who actually have to teach him how to put together a cohesive argument. 

Time to Clear This All Up

24 days ago
The Bible, Shakespeare, and the usual famous dead Greek guys are something everyone should really have at least some passing familiarity with. They're important not just in their own right but for being THE shared cultural touchstones for Western society, they're so heavily referenced in art and writing in so many ways you really do yourself a disservice not knowing at least some of the basics.

My favorite Bible version for that sweet spot between readability and poetic flow is the English Standard Version, but Malk usually has a couple of his own recommendations. (Avoid the original King James Version imo, a lot of people swear by it as the earliest completed English translation, but the language is pretty difficult even if really beautiful in places. The main thing though is that Malk says it's not a great translation anyway since it makes some big leaps and assumptions in certain passages.)

You are going to want some kind of guide to historical context for the Old Testament though, but Bibles with notes and maps are common.

Edit: found an earlier post where he called the NRSV the gold standard.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
My understanding is KJV is trash, but most of my fundie church families swear by it. Back when my family went through the charismatic non-denominational thing, though, it was NIV. I decided to buy myself a JPS Tanakh to get what I assume is a decently accurate Hebrew translation. Interesting stuff for Christians in that. Probably Isaiah 7:14 stands out most to me, as someone raised in the most fundie way possible.

But my favorite for the New Testament is the Middle English Wycliffe Bible, for no other reason than Middle English is fun.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Most fundie boomers swear by the KJV, that was also what I was taught about it too. I think that could be phasing out with the younger generation though simply because of the literacy issue. I guess the idea is that the KJV came from the "original source", but it's not like tons of other translations don't also go back to the Greek and Hebrew, and a lot has been discovered since then to increase the understanding of how the books were written. This is a recent (2018) translation of the Old Testament that also came highly recommended by Malk btw: https://www.amazon.com/Hebrew-Bible-Translation-Commentary-Three/dp/0393292495 It's got more of a "literary" focus but some extensive commentary on the original Hebrew and why the translator made certain choices. You can view a good amount in the preview, it's pretty cool because it talks about a lot of puns and plays on words and parallel language used in the original. (This is one of the things that indicates to me that even in the original Hebrew the focus was not always on objective accuracy but on being pleasing to the ear.) For instance the word that the KJV translates labeling Eve as a "help meet" is "notoriously difficult", as it can mean variously something like alongside him, a counterpart too, opposite him, or something like "intervening on behalf of" used in Psalms in a military context. The passage about the serpent and the head/heel is pretty garbled from the verse we're used to seeing, and in Hebrew they paired a homonym that can be both the sound of a snake hissing and "to trample". The ways Eve's name can be explained are interesting too.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I'll check it out next time I get sucked into this topic. Dr. Alter not only seems to be well-respected by his peers based on my five minutes of googling, he also (almost) has a perfectly aptronymic last name.

Time to Clear This All Up

24 days ago

In my fundamentalist, faith healing, tongue speaking, hand raising in worship and fifteen minute tithe sermon childhood religious training, that passage definitely applied to the whole book. Probably because it was usually the good ol' King James version, which says "book" and not "scroll." Never mind the fact that the canon was not yet established and there certainly wasn't a single book containing all the Gospels and Tanakh and so on.

Nevertheless, that is we they believed. After all, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;" in those branches of Christianity, such passages have multiple meanings. Not just Jesus as some believe, but the Bible itself as well is a physical manifestation of that "Word" which John starts with, and it just applies to whatever they need it to. Take it on faith. Let the Holy Spirit guide your understanding.

So yeah, the Bible is timeless because John refers to it as well as Jesus in its opening sentence, and because the KJV says "book," well, Rev 22:18 applies to the entire thing. Also "scroll" is like a book, so it counts. Or so the thinking seemed to go. A lot of intuition and, (I think the term is) sympathetic magic (these spritual laws; certain utterances like "in JESUS name" whilst the speaker has unshakable faith, hands touching foreheads to heal or cast out demonds, etc. Normal Christians thought we were a cult when they came to our Youth Group services, and in hindsight I can see why).

Somewhere I got derrailed....

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
See I always thought the usual interpretation of that was "no Joseph Smithing."

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Dire really did a service for the thread, because when Blister got triggered here that was the point I realized he must be heavily autistic in addition to the other things he has going on.

This is actually a great example though of the importance of context: it's the exact same word, but for cultural reasons the meaning is different. And if the sentence can mean two things, someone coming along later would have to look at the surrounding clues to make their best guess at which it was and rephrase it in a way that clarifies that--or in a way that reinforces the meaning they already believe or prefer which can be a case with some translators.

Anyway, I cornered Malk tonight and made him break down a Hebrew verse for me, and I have concluded that Hebrew is REALLY hard to follow. They have 13 vowels for one thing, and everything is written backwards. And that's the barest technical baby steps without even getting into things like words that are an entire phrase about an abstract concept, or words with specific context sensitive meanings that end up as the same less nuanced English word.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
For me it was a bit of a red flag when Blister says he doesn't read stories with female protagonists because he is not interested in exploring other points of view. Someone that close-minded can never have a healthy and normal view of the world. Also, only ever reading one book (whether it is the Bible, Qur'an or something else) is also not a good idea.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I'm just happy my post came out that coherently, I was falling asleep but saw I had a tab open where I'd apparently started to type something about Dire the other night. So I typed that and then passed out, and I'm happy to see there were no bizarre autocorrects for once.

Anyway, saying "autism" is always a 50/50 chance of being correct around here, but that may be giving him too much credit. I forgot that given the speed of the reply with all those verses and some others not quite making sense the way he used them, someone had suggested ChatGPT, so it might just look like robotic spewing because it is. Maybe that's what I'd meant to type there.

But also yeah, I had thought that was pretty weird as well, though now I just assume it's part of leaning into his "girls are icky" theme harder than anyone I've ever seen. Guess it's a good thing they don't seem to teach about WWII in Texas schools anymore or he'd have to take a failing grade on Anne Frank.

He also left comments saying he gave Inseparable and Now You Gotta Deal With This S*** both a 1/8 without reading them lol.


Edit: given some of the replies to Petros I'm still leaning autism though. He instantly accepted the idea that MHD was a big hung gay black man in a dress after all.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Oh, I was actually curious about something regarding this.

@Blister1 so we've established you don't read stories with protagonists that don't share your gender- what about stories with protagonists that don't share your race, would you read those? Or stories with protagonists with a different belief system than you?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Since you have tagged me I will answer this question.

I don't read girls with female protagonists because I'm not a girl and do not wish to read stories from the perspective of a girl. I DO NOT have a problem with reading stories with protagonists that don't share my race or stories with protagonists with a different belief system than me, of course, that is that they are not persecuting my religion or my race,however, I'm fine with reading history stories contains all of these

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

This is one of the weirdest things I have ever heard.  Do you watch movies that have a female lead protagonist?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
yes

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Then why not books?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
What is specifically the problem with books then?


Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

sooo this is different than reading a story with female protagonist how?  Im honestly asking the question, this is kinda fascinating.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
When the six moons rise over Ch'zx'ttk IV, the Z'rk sharpen their six scything appendages before the sacred Wkka stone in preparation for the Great Harvest..

Warrior Four Sixteen of the N'zzgaga Hive rips a bloody swath through an unsuspecting Softling village, in triumph hauling back bundles of bloody appendages and the Softlings' still mewling young.

The Laborer Caste by now has prepared the Octogonal Chambers, each one with a layer of fresh soil and soft and fragrant dried grasses collected last summer. Gently onto each of them is set a pile of flesh about the size of the abdomen of an adult Z'rk, then more soil and grass is heaped over it, except for a hollowed out depression.

The time comes upon Warrior Four Sixteen; into each of the hollows, one by one she begins to lay her translucent eggs, and this is the point where Blister tabs out in disgust at the realization he's been following the story of a female. It's just too weird now, man.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

lol. 

But what kinda fascinates me is that, for example, he would be ok watching the movie, "Gone with the Wind", but not the novel. Or perhaps would watch "The Hunger Games" but would not read the book.  The disjointed reasoning that apparently he somehow reconciles in his mind is interesting.

However, I will probably be bored of it now if he gets around to explaining.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Then I will spare you my explanation, especially since it is simple and already been stated many times

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Stated where?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Well that's fine, if you don't want to answer that's your business.

But truthfully in none of your posts did you ever explain the difference for you between why a movie is ok but not a book.  Saying you have already explained it is simply not true.  The only place you addressed it is in response to RK who followed up on my question.  So at least be honest and don't make stuff up.

After reading your explanation I still don't think the logic follows and I would encourage you to perhaps rethink your reasoning.

I would have probably made a couple suggestions about your thoughts, but since you want to be rude and lie about stuff it's probably not worth my time.

 

 

 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
What are you even talking about?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Learn to read.  It's a great skill to have.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
It's beginning to piss me off that he doesn't.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Finally you're not pissed off by an opinion of mine

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
.....

Okay, NOW I've moved past "beginning".

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
It has been over 4 hours of this conversation. I think it is time to move on, at least I will be moving on from this. Thanks for those who heard me out and gave me good advice. Have a good rest of y'all's day.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Girls are icky.

And Blister has to sidestep and run off for a stimming session any time he's asked a question he doesn't have a good answer to. I am questioning more and more the idea this kid is in high school.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Most of my friends are in fact girls, I just don't like reading from a girl's perspective. Why do y'all make every one of opinions a big deal and say I am wrong because my opinion is different?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
When you hold very odd opinion that intentionally narrows your perspective that very few (if any) others hold, it is reasonable to search for the reason

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
It has been every opinion that I have had on this site gets shot down by y'all.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
You have a set of very alien opinions and you wall yourself off from forces that could change your mind. I have been trolling you, but I genuinely want you to think.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
So this is a very arbitrary belief system that doesn't make sense.

I mean, even if your belief is wrong, it would better if it was logically consistent.

Like, say you're a white 17 year old boy. Then in your belief system, you would be logically consistent if you only consume media about white, teenage boys, with them as the focus and the main character.

You would be a bigot and dumb, but at least logically consistent.

But you also admit that you don't mind race, or different experiences, and gender is the only hang up you have. Why?

You further muddle your point by saying if a movie has a girl protagonist, that's ok, but if a book does, you stop reading. Why? What's the difference for you, and what makes a female led movie ok but not a female led book?

So when you say stupid stuff randomly that isn't even logically inconsistent, people will call you out on it and say that you're dumb. You still offered no explanation why female led movies are ok but not books. Like DB said, there are movies that are adapted from books, so will you just watch the adaptation and not the source material because it's in the medium you prefer? Like, you got to tell us more dude.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I much rather watch movies than books and generally only read books for school other than the Bible.

When it comes to reading books from a girl's perspective, I feel icky, just like when I only have girls around me I feel uncomfortable... When reading a book, I read from the protagonist's perspective or in a 3rd person perspective. So when reading a book from a girl's perspective I can't relate, but also I feel uncomfortable.

Some things are ok to feel uncomfortable about: giving speeches in front of people, riding roller coasters, talking to the girl you like, talking about something uncomfortable, personal, or heavy. But this is not something that is worth getting uncomfortable for.

With movies, even if it is narrated by a girl, I don't have to read as if i'm the girl, I see it from the 3rd person view as if I am there which takes away the feeling of being uncomfortable.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

So you feel icky when just around girls? Sounds gay to me. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
When it is just girls

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I don't think you're gay Blister. I just think you're dealing with a lot, and I think you just need to put the work in.

I think you're trying, and the first step to pushing past this is to accept that you have a hang up towards books with a female MC, and then trying to work through it. Try thinking about the character as just a character, rather than feeling "icky" or "weird". Just focus on the character, and in your mind, imagine the world. Focus on the prose the author uses to establish the world, and really imagine the scenarios. Imagine the various scenes, and slowly, you'll be busy having fun rather than thinking about or experiencing these hangups.

You can work through it if you believe in yourself.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Maybe, I'll see about giving it a try when I have time

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
That's all we ask. Hope you have a good trip man!

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I will! I just hope God moves just like he did on all of my other mission trips

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
So icky it is, thank you for the honesty.

And yet you said most of your friends are girls. You should just have one of them make an account tbh.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I could, but they would not use this site much, and they wouldn't engage as much as I would to these conversations

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I said I have many, not most

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

You literally did say most. Scroll up a little. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Well, that sucks. Too late to edit that comment. But hey, I made a mistake...

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
No worries, man. We all make mistakes! That is what makes us human. But we can work past it.

You say that you don't read female protagonists as a rule, right?

As an experiment, why not try reading a story with a female protagonist here on CYS.

You could read "Vira and the Cupcake" by star girl.

You could read Agent of Order by Mizal

You could read anyone of MHD's stories. I mean "Basement Rats" is fantastic.

You can read any of Mystic Warrior's stories. She writes stories with a lot of female protagonists.

Just try it first, and when you feel those feelings, try to focus on the story.

Try one, and see if you get better.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Thanks, finally someone who gives encouraging advice when it comes to opposing opinions

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
No worries man. It's fun to talk. I'm sure you'll work past this and find a whole new world of literature opened up to you.

Maybe you can even take a book along with you to the mission trip. Something like "Little Women", "House on the Prairie", or if you're more into action, "the girl with the dragon tattoo."

The reason why I listed these books is to illustrate that there's a whole range of books with female MCs. Literature with female protagonists isn't limited to one specific genre, and whatever genre you're into, you'll probably find a book with a female protagonist that you will like.

There are literally just as many different types of female protagonists as there are male protagonists, so you'll find a book you like. I'm sure of it.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Yeah, I looked it up to see if I had read any popular books by a female author. Other than J K Rowlings, I have not read many other popular books.

I love action books and movies, so if there is ever a female protagonist in an action movie (Divergent, Hunger Games, ect.) then I don't mind watching it... as long as there is very little kissing stuff :P

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

So you feel uncomfortable when reading/watching anything with romance? I totally get that, I think most kids are for a while. Do you think you feeling uncomfortable with reading from a girl's POV has something to do with that? Maybe because girls are linked in your mind with romance? 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Maybe.... That is a good point, I think part of it is that I don't like looking from things from a perspective that I don't understand, or like I said, makes me uncomfortable

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

I can understand not wanting to think about things that are uncomfortable or that you don't understand, but a lot of growth can come from that. Almost nothing worthwhile comes easy. I think you're taking a step in the right direction by listening to some of the suggestions in this thread. I think you'll find a lot of really amazing books that have female protagonists. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Ok, thanks

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I dislike romance the most out of every category so it could make it harder because most books I see written from a girl always shares a similar theme to romance, I'm not a big fan of dramatic books either where the protagonist is extremely motivated by there emotions, although I'm ok if they're motivated by anger or out of revenge.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Ahhh, I see. I think you'll find that there are a lot of books without romance themes in them though if you look any farther than your school library. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
maybe, I'm not a big reader, but I'll try it

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I haven't been following this thread much so I apologize if this is restating anything, but just going to jump in and second Stargirl's past few comments. Blister, it's fine if you decide you don't like romance; plenty of people don't. Though I would recommend giving it some time & a few attempts before you write any genre off. Stargirl's definitely right that it's good to do things that make you uncomfortable sometimes--that's how you grow as a person. And getting comfortable thinking about women is pretty important, since they make up 50% of people. Reading books with female narrators is a great place to start, and as others have said, there are plenty of stories with female protagonists that don't focus on romance at all. Anyways, in a thread where everyone is jumping on you, I want to step back applaud your willingness to try out some new things and broaden your perspective. I hope you enjoy some of the stories that have been recommended in this thread!

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Thanks

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Shameless self-promotion but Reborn has a female protagonist, no romance, and no bad words, so maybe it'd be a good starting point.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I'll check that out when I can, thanks for telling me about it

Edit: You won with this story, i'll definitely add it to my list of storygames to play and rate :D

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I think I'll read that one eventually, probably in December if I join this newest contest (and if I ever find the 13th ending in Eternal). Let me go ahead and start and save it so I have it easy to find.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I was gonna do the same thing

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Read the Hiding Place by Corrie ten Boom. It's an autobiographical book by a very Christian Dutch woman who was arrested by the Nazis for protecting Jews in the Holocaust.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I recognize that name, can't say I know her well though

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Please don't read vira and cupcake lol. I wrote that when I was like 12/13 and I really need to unpublish it. 
 

edit: unpublished 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I won't, thanks for informing me

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Ok, that's a little better at least. I can work with this.

This is something that goes away with maturity. And the only way to become more mature is to do the thing that makes you uncomfortable.

You don't have to. Obviously, none of us can make you do anything.

But the reason why we are all against you is because there's no actual upside to not reading books with female protagonists. You miss out on some really good literature written by some incredibly talented authors.

I do sympathize you and I hope you work past this. Just try and keep this in mind: it's ok to read books with female protagonists. I know it's a psychological thing so just try to work through it and convince yourself that it's ok to read books with a female protagonist. Try to focus on the story rather than the character. Don't think of women as some unknown, alien species, they're literally just like you. A story will feature a character's hopes, dreams, struggles, and triumphs, and regardless of gender, you can put yourself in the mind of another character and experience their life story.

This will help you with empathy and understanding people. I know it's hard, but try your best man. We're all rooting for you.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Bro but they have BOOBS! Just like Ogre!

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

So when you're reading the Bible, do you skip the parts with female protagonists, like where Miriam protected Moses or when Esther was queen?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
No

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

You know what, here's a simple assignment: re-read a short passage in the Bible about a female protagonist. It can be any of them. Then, think about what message God intended to teach the world through her. This could be themes of faith, bravery, etc.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Ok, I'll do that next time I read the bible

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Why do you think it is that being around only girls makes you feel icky? Why are you unable to relate to a character simply because they are of the other sex?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I'm not going over it again. Read the other replies

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Bro's scared of catching cooties.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
She's trying to get you to dig deeper. Why does it make you feel uncomfortable?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
If only kids could read.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

The kid is so retarded he looped around to accidentally being based.

 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Considering you think women are such disgusting creatures why don't you just admit to yourself that you want to fuck dudes?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Because I don't think that, and find that thought highly revolting, and it is wrong

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Wasn't talking to you, faggot.

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

Disgusting? No. Women are beautiful creatures. It's just such a shame they're not good people.

And I fucking wish I found dudes attractive, it would make life so much easier.

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

Nah we dont want you either it's cool

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

How do you hate women and gays? Do you just hate anyone you want to have sex with who doesnt reciprocate? 

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
I never said I hated either of them. Being gay is wrong according to the Bible, so I don't like the gay lifestyle. And I never said that I hated women, I respect them for many reasons. And no, that third question is horrible

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

I wasn't replying to you, retard. But interesting that you thought I was

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
It is incredibly hard to figure out where each response it pointed too, also, your question literally had everything we talked about yesterday, so it was hard to tell. At least I was able to put it out there

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

Well while you're answering questions, when is the last time you checked the CO2 levels in your house?

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
never... maybe I should do that

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

Sure sounds like someone on the dev team could get around to fucking implementing that feature I asked for to easily see who the post is replying to.

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
What's this dev team you mention?

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

I've not been keeping up. Did ford die? I hope he did.

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

He's been dead for quite some time. I was actually wondering why you hadn't celebrated sooner.

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago

I've noticed his site account has been gone for a while now, I just figured he was doing some retarded shit with accounts again, but was still there "in the background".

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
Yeah he's gone.

I heard his plane crashed into the ocean and then when he swam to the shore of a nearby island he was raped to death by natives who now use his skull as a chamberpot.

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
Pro tip:
Step 1: line your mouse up along the leftmost vertical line of a post.
Step 2: Hold the mouse still and use your mouse wheel to scroll up until your cursor intersects the horizontal line of a post to where there is line on both the left and right side of your cursor.

And now you have discovered which post the one you are considering is replying to.

Of course, Step 0 is either to get a mouse with a wheel and/or play enough PC games to be skilled enough to move the mouse wheel without moving the mouse.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
What is the point of literally restating an ENTIRE conversation? She could just go and read what has already been said without me having to say it again.

Edit: Man this auto correct is gonna kill me

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

She's not asking about what's already been said, she has already read that and used it to formulate this question. She wants to hear what you're not saying, what you keep attempting to end the conversation to avoid saying, whether due to your fear, or your intellectual cowardice, or simply as the instinctual side effect of living the mechanistic and thoroughly unobserved existence you have been so far. You have told us all what you feel, and we have found it truly confounding. You are being asked to question yourself, and examine why you might feel that way. Use your own words, if you're physically capable.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Why are you talking for Daji? The question has been asked already

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Anyone who can look at words and understand already knows that's not what she asked you.

You are reaching Alien levels of non comprehension and it is so frustrating lol. Genuinely why is it so hard for you guys to process the meaning of simple sentences in your native language?

And you don't need the attitude art Sent trying to make things simpler for you, you're going to end up putting frogs in your ass just to spite him at this rate, sheesh.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Because I have reading comprehension! And if I were curious, I would have asked the same question she did and been equally annoyed as everyone else re-explaining the question to you like a toddler.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

But you've told people like 50 times already to just go and read your former replies, what is the difference. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Fine, since not many people on here have enough common sense to understand this:

I don't relate to girls because our minds are wired pretty differently and being around so many people who are pretty different without anyone or many of the people that I find similar makes me uncomfortable.

Also, a big thing that I have not already said is that:

I respect girls, and will do anything to make sure they're comfortable, so if that means me not being with a group of mostly or all girls helps me since I know that I'm not "intruding" or making the girls uncomfortable with my presence, even if they're aren't uncomfortable with my presence, at least I know i'm letting them be surrounded by their friends.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Why do you think girls are uncomfortable with your presence?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I'm gonna be questioned about every statement I make aren't I?

Whatever, lets get this over with:

I haven't always been the most social person, but when I found a church that God was using to grow me, I started to be more open and talk to lots of people (some of y'all know this all too well). But when it comes to being around girls, all I want is them to be comfortable, and a few times in the past this has not been the case. So I usually let the girl(s) decide if they want to be around me. When it comes to a group of girls, they might not be comfortable with talking about the same stuff with their friends because a boy is with them, and so the subject of the conversation has to change because there is an entirely different mind and person.

Now, as many of y'all have noticed, I am great at answering some questions, and terrible at answering others... some simply because I have not given much thought, and I'm not a risk taker. I like to be comfortable and I hate making mistakes.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

There's literally no consequences to making mistakes here. Nobody knows who you are. If you get banned you can just go to another corner of the internet. Nobody cares that much and none of this is going to matter in like a week. 
 

Also, making mistakes is how you grow as a person. You're never going to get better at anything if you don't fail a million times first. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Well, I would like to be more confident in myself, but it's not like I try

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
Yeah, I think you're overthinking it. Unless you're hella creepy with heavy breathing and random petting I don't think girls would react differently to your being present than they would if another girl was there. I think getting into a relationship at some point would help you see that apart from minor differences in some individuals (like use of make-up or being, on the whole, more emotionally aware) girls and guys are very similar. Some people like to talk about things exclusively with their friends but this isn't a guy / girls thing, that's just having a closer relationship with someone over someone else. You should chill more, try more different things and not worry so much about normal everyday relationships.

Your opinions are pretty weird but past the sneering and trolling I think (some) people are trying to encourage you with this. You do fine at talking to girls on here (you and Avo chatted away so much I mentally blanked out the entire thread) and should just take this into your real-life situation as well. It sounds like you have some pretty extreme and poorly justified beliefs which you may or may not grow out of at some point (I'm not talking about your religious beliefs here). Addressing the logical inconsistencies in your beliefs would help make them less bizarre and more mainstream which would, on the whole help you in life and also in achieving your goals like spreading God's message and so on.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Okay, well this is interesting. Why do you think you're so unique among humankind in finding relating to others such a barrier? Even when you're safely at home and the girls are only fictional?
.
How about when they're written by a male author?

And that's still going to raise the question for many of why girls specifically.
You have far, far less in common with people in a wildly foreign culture who lived thousands of years ago after all.

Have these girls ever told you they were uncomfortable with your presencec though? I can't really believe you'd be able to figure it out any other way, if you find their thought processes and emotional expressions so different from yours they might as well be reptilian aliens.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Also, I would not call it common sense. You are actually very unusual. Most men are fine being around women and vice-versa. After all, we have to get along with family and in the workplace and in school with people who are different from us all the time--even disregarding the fact that most people do find someone of the other sex they are even comfortable with enough to marry.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I'm not extremely uncomfortable around girls, only when I'm in a large group of them. If I know them it is still a little uncomfortable. Also, with so many of y'all replying, I'm having to have a few tabs open

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Commended by Celicni on 10/3/2025 3:06:13 AM

A large group, you say?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

As somebody who has lots of guy best friends (and a brother), you guys are really not that different from us. Maybe you've ingested a lot of media that tells you otherwise, but from my experience there are only a few small differences here and there; however, everybody is going to have small differences with everybody else so it doesn't really matter that much. 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Makes sense. And in case some of y'all didn't know, the only social media I use is YouTube. So I generally don't have much of a social life on the internet. Plus, I would not use it much or for the same purpose as many people in my generation do

Time to Clear This All Up

22 days ago
Is this COG reader syndrome? Lol. How are you going to be able to write and improve your writing, when you limit yourself so much?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I wonder if that could be because you're dogsh1t at explaining them and them like to dodge any counterpoints when people do make the mistake of trying to engage you seriously.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

Because that opinion doesn't make any sense and is limiting you so much. 
 

Also, you're not answering any of us. Why do you not like reading from girl's perspectives? 

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Is it simply because you find girl things boring perhaps? When I was a lot younger I thought that before I had actually read anything good from a girl's perspective. That of course changed, and now I wrote a pretty highly rated story from a girl's perspected, and I had a hell of a lot of fun living through her eyes as I wrote it. So, I think maybe you ought to give it a chance and see if you can relate. But you probably need to find the right story to get you into that frame where you can see the world from the opposite gender's point of view.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
You know you're really starting to get a reputation as a guy who says breathtakingly stupid things and then won't explain them.

If you feel strongly about a thing you should be able to articulate why. Opinions don't form in a vacuum. If you said you hated oranges, or carbonated soda, or a book or movie for any other reason, there's a reason for that.

Or is this more of a primal kneejerk revulsion from the depths of the grey matter that doesn't make any kind of logical sense even to you?

That in itself is at least a kind of explanation. But are you really going to volunteer details like this as a part of a public discussion and then act all bewildered when people pretty naturally want to know why?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Can't say I get in conversations concerning opinions with adults, as well as all of them on the opposite side of them who all shoot me down

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
I can see why you feel that way, given the issue with the gays. But on this particular one, people are actually confused and are curious about why, as far as I can tell.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Dude, you have to grow up. That is a really childish mentality to have and you're basically shutting yourself off from fiction that contains half of the world's perspectives. This kind of thinking is going to make you less socially aware.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

" I cAnT SeE frOm a WoMAns POV beCauSE I DoNtT HaVe BoOBS" 

Dude, most people can watch The Lion King and relate to animated animals. As a man, I typically prefer male protagonists, but I can certainly enjoy a female protagonist, just like I can an anthropomorphized animal or even a damn car if its written well enough. How is being a woman such a big symmetry breaker?

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

I'm... confused. 

Do you think reading books from a girl's perspective will turn you trans or something? I really can't think of a logical reason for this. 

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
What version of the Bible are you using? The word homosexuality as well as our specific definition of it is a modern one and does not appear in most translations.

I'm waiting for Malk to go more into that one though.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
NLT, for most of the verses, sometimes niv or nkj

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
Lmao

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
NLT has been the easiest one for me to understand. Plus, all translations have the same value, they are just worded differently since most Greek, Latin, or Hebrew words have more than one translation in English

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
....which frequently changes their meaning, yes.

Words have a funny way of doing that when you use different ones instead.

Need to get Daji up in here with the Message lol.

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago
He'd probably like it.
Blister, translation can matter because English often has a different structure than or lacks words that are one-to-one equivalents to the original language of the Bible. So translators need to use their knowledge of the Bible, the culture, etc. to make translations while also being careful not to change the meaning of the text. You wouldn't want Google Translate to translate your Bible for you. The NLT has such an emphasis on readability and modernity that it can sometimes play fast and loose with things compared to some other translations.
Ultimately, the best Bible (assuming it's one translated in good faith) is the one you will actually read. However, I would be open to improving your reading level and checking out other versions. You can even go to websites like Blue Letter Bible to compare translations. :)

Time to Clear This All Up

25 days ago

The bible was not written in English. 

Leviticus 18:22, you've selected an incredibly free translation. An accurate rendering is: "Do not lay with a man in the manner of a woman". There is no word in Biblical Hebrew for homosexuality. 

Time to Clear This All Up

24 days ago
I can just imagine the heavy sigh with which that first line was written.

Time to Clear This All Up

24 days ago

Funnily enough, my dad studied Hebrew (not sure if it was the Biblical Hebrew, though), and he talked to me about the inaccuracies of the translation from Hebrew to English multiple times when I was young. 

Time to Clear This All Up

24 days ago
https://www.amazon.ca/Hebrew-Bible-Translation-Commentary/dp/0393292495

This is a version Malk highly recommends when pestered. But some things are just hard to translate, Hebrew is a very complex language and there aren't 1 for 1 meanings for a lot of things, and others are a best guess based on context.

That's the good translations anyway, not the ones that make leaps to more easily match the translators pre conceived beliefs.

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago

It looks interesting, but I don't have that much money, lol. Thanks anyways!

Time to Clear This All Up

23 days ago
Oh yeah, forgot I was talking to a kid. If you dad reads Hebrew he probably has a lot of good resources on this kind of thing anyway.

Time to Clear This All Up

21 days ago
.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
So this is the reason Blister has been trying to vote me out of the mafia game.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Can't say I know what you mean.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Use your context clues. 

(Pretty sure she's a lesbian, or at least in some way queer)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
She's a 7'8" hung, gay black man wearing a dress

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Also an Amish Eskimo.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I didn't know that.

Sorry MHD, but I do not make most choices based on people's sexuality or other related things, especially if I don't know you

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Commended by EndMaster on 9/30/2025 9:18:37 PM
Gay men are icky

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That's why we Holocausted them

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

I fucking wish we did.

Or that the Holocaust ever happened.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

You're brown and very obviously gay, you literally would have been one of them. You aint on the team bitch

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Honestly, I need to stop this here, I have been talking with y'all about this for over 3 hours straight since I have been home, so I need to go do other stuff.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Hey Blister,
Just some future advice. You got to learn to let things go and at some point, just leave. The more you talk, the more you're just digging yourself in a grave. I don't mean this in an insult, I mean this with all the love in my heart, but you need to know when to stop, because you will just tire yourself out.

I don't even know what's going on(came to the thread late lol), but it sounded like you wanted to stop multiple times but then pulled yourself back in to the discussion to address another point. So on the internet, when it gets to that point, and you're not having fun, just close the laptop.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
RK, you're being a killjoy again

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Don't worry Petros, I don't think he'll listen anyway.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
He's not even reading it.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I'm not sure about this, signalling he wanted to debate a topic with wacky fervor but then sidestepping everyone's points was what really turned the tide against Flutter that time. It's not a good look, as some might say.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

I don't think this is quite the same thing as what Flutter did. (As Flutter explained his reasons for not addressing all "the little details" from what I remember. Of course, this is ignoring the fact that Flutter came to the conclusion that he was just more right than everyone, claiming to have already thought through every counter argument to his beliefs in advance essentially.)

I may be reading the situation wrong, but Blister to me just seems like someone who feels very very inclined to explain/justify his beliefs thoroughly every time they are questioned for whatever reason. I don't think he's deliberately trying to participate in an active debate or have his views meaningfully challenged, he just seems to have a sporadic drive to defend any accusation to his beliefs whenever it just so happens to cross his path.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I was mostly just referring to RK's suggestion of "stepping away", which can be very situational. Very very few other parallels to Flutter, thankfully.

He definitely should've answered Petros's important question though!

Also, this might be the most coherent post I've ever seen from you. If you're taking something, it's working.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Commended by Mizal on 9/30/2025 9:17:47 PM

Goodness this is a miserable thread, it gives me indigestion to read. That all input is met by the mechanistic and cyclical meanderings of an unthinking creature with a disemboweled soul, his very being stunted and twisted like a bonsai tree around the wires of backwards and often recently invented dogmas. Like a conniving cancer cell he must push himself and others toward this skeletal existence that has no room for the actual, many-faceted reality which these teachings were meant to prepare and adapt humans for. If I believed that this was the nature of God, I would have tried to off myself, too.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
www.dictionary.com

(The kids are going to need it.)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Commended by ISentinelPenguinI on 9/30/2025 9:31:47 PM
At this point, all I can say without losing braincells is,
Imagine not being able to form opinions of your own, purely quoting a book which you admitted had been translated several times several ways, and managing to piss off even the people who call others faggots on the daily. In fact, you're so retarded I've gotten second hand embarrassment being near you in an online forum. I can't tell if you're brainwashed or just plain stupid, and neither way works in your favor.

I tried to play nice by pming you but from all I've seen on this thread I genuinely don't know if there's a single space in your head that has a single original thought. You're a bible-humper in the worst way because you don't even know anything besides what's been spoon fed down your throat by the dear daddy church.

You're an insult to all Christians who truly just want to believe in God and preach the gospel AS THEY INTERPRET IT, BECAUSE THAT'S HOW RELIGION IS SUPPOSED TO BE. Religion is an interpretation used for faith and the strengthening of the human spirit, not whatever this bullshit is.

Your stupid ass is going to martyr yourself either way, content with how long you've been living in a ditch under a rock in Chernobyl. 'Oh, the internet dwellers don't understand! I tried so graciously to listen to them too!' No you fucking didn't. You read, didn't comprehend, didn't think, and spouted up verses like they were your own thoughts.

I have at least five Christian friends who hate me because I'm a cock sucking tranny and think I'm going to hell, but they're still my friends because they don't force all their religion shit on me, and if they do, they can have a coherent discussion using their own thoughts without just throwing out bible verses. I have even more friends who're Christian who don't even give a single fuck, because they keep to themselves and interpret the gospel as spreading love and kindness. Are they not true Christians? What about you, Blister? Hate the sin love the sinner? Love thy neighbor? See, I can also throw out poorly translated bible verses without an opinion. Fuck you.

Who the fuck cares. You're going to go crying to your mommy and block the site anyway because of all those meanies were telling you to use your brain. I despise everything you stand for and every point you've made. I fucking hate this stupid fucking thread. Kys.

Tl;dr: lol, fag.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

This thread is now Liminal's coming out party

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I thought everyone knew already. It’s pretty apparent.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I ain't reading allat

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That’s why theres a very helpful tl;dr that explains everything ^-^

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I ain't readin' that either. My laziness exceeds the bounds of mortal ken

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Wait are you FTM?

THEN I WAS RIGHT

I can detect biology through typing habits, just a little thing I do.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
FTM! So close, very impressed, though.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
That was a little goof which I have now repaired to CONTINUE BEING RIGHT

I knew Gryphon was biologically female as well and that Kiel was a natural born cunt.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

You also guessed Abge if I recall correctly.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Abge originally came to us as a little girl, then later came back as a non gendered robot who "didn't feel emotions" and also funnily began typing like a robot too, all 80k words at once.

Also, she was an attention seeking compulsive liar, it's funny she clashed so much with someone else we knew in hindsight.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I didn't know you were trans Liminal. Congrats! I think you're officially the second based trans member on the site, and you're definitely better than abgeo. Oddly enough, they actually were a pretty long-term member when I came to the site, but then they blew it all up by cheating with AI.

Also, is this thread Blister saying that being gay is bad or something? If that's the case, then he's going to be in for a rude awakening once he goes to college. I mean, unless he's going to BYU or something, he's going to meet new people who challenge his viewpoints and live different lifestyles than what he's used to. Hopefully, that means he'll grow as a person.

I mean this is just such a reductive view of looking at humanity, and while there's certainly nothing wrong with being religious, there's more to you as a person Blister, and you need to expand your mental framework some more.

You can't live life like this Blister. Sooner or later, the pressure is going to get to you. Plus, this kind of thinking is just going to make you go crazy man.

There are so many incredibly kind and gracious people who fully embrace their Christian faith, but they don't use it to beat others over the head with a stick. You really have to grow as a person.

I still have no idea what this thread is supposed to be about, but Blister, you got to relax and chill out.

I have no idea what the Bible says about homosexuality, but I know Christians who can love their fellow man and treat people with respect regardless of their views on what's sinful or not.

I'm really not trying to disrespect your religious beliefs, Christianity is a great religion! I'm just saying you also have to have a code as a human being to treat everyone else like human beings and respect them rather than be uptight or so rigid.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
This thread happened because I am a master baiter

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Lol, that is hilarious! I really want to see what initial comment led to this thread being started.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Summary of the thread this far for those just now meeting up with us:

>Blister is presented with silly hypotheticals
>Site members having fun, especially Petros
>I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream is recommended by Mizal, along with a link. (Everyone should read that, by the way.)
>Suddenly, religion is brought up far more
>Deep intellectual debate but just on one side
>Blister shows sheer lack of original thought
>Site members slightly disturbed, still making fun
>Blister "leaves" several times
>Petros has some more fun and him and Mizal continue to be my favorite duo on the forums when trashing a noob.
>Liminal has a crashout and reveals that he was, in fact, trans the whole time which was pretty obvious.
>Petros doesn't want to read.
>RK shows up and is wholesome and tries to give good, kind advice.
>Petros likes to master bait.

All in all, a solid binge reading thread if you'd like to see the hopelessness of our future society.

(Also thanks! I'm surprised Mizal didn't figure it out, seemed like she knew already hahah.)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
Thanks for the tldr! All of this makes more sense now.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
A lot of this was split off the quote thread earlier, in which I quoted AM's hate monologue from the story and a discussion was had over what kind of content Blister preferred to avoid. (Something he'd brought up in his other thread.)

The answer was the very American "violence fine, sex bad", and then Petros got off work around then and decided to troll Blistee by making him think. (Though he still has not answered the most important question..)

The Gay Debate is one of my favorites though. Always predictable starting out since in the entire Bible there's only those same couple of verses, and people will usually tell on themselves with how much gay sex lives rent free in their mind versus what's actually in the text. (Why has "God hates bankers" never caught on, isn't there way more backing that one up?)

Blister sadly is just awful at debating, but he's pretty young. A writing site is really not the place to fall apart when presented with the idea that words have meaning and phrasing matters though, lol.

I always assume it's specifically an American thing to paralyze in a fetal position when it comes to grasping concepts like things not easily translating 1 to 1 across cultures and languages. But in this case dude was already getting stunlocked at the point where different words in English meant different things so idk, might just be that kids have super unique and special brains.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Life will probably force him to loosen his views a lot, like you said, he's quite young. I remember having rather conservative views about stuff like sex too when I was a kid, it seems pretty typical for children to be that way. Sex is always icky. People almost never change their minds in the moment, never expect that in a debate, it's in the hours and days after, when they're still chewing on it that they start rethinking things. With some of the comments that were made though, it made me feel like we had Bezro back, warping IP addresses and time and space.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I don't give a crap if he changes his mind, but if someone is prepared to die on a hill they need to be able to articulate why.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Fair.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
And what I called Blister is actually extremely funny, if you don't get it it means you just don't know the secret lore.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

"God Hates Bankers" has never caught on cause if the anti-gay politicians said that, then who would donate to their campaigns and handle their offshore accounts?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Gryphon is trans too I think.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
This is honestly the only thing that I have actually read from this thread today.

I get what you are saying. The purpose of this thread was that Petros asked a question regarding murder and homosexual intercourse. I had no intent of beating people in the head in the stick with this thread. I already know about Homo stuff in this world, and I hate that it exists, but like I said yesterday, just because someone is LGBTQ+, does not mean I hate that person but rather their lifestyle. I wish that would be able to see what I see that it is wrong, but I understand that not everyone believes the same. However, if you are Christian, you should know what the bible says what is right and what is wrong. Homosexuality in its entirety is wrong because it is not the way God designed it.

Matthew 19:4-6 The Message (MSG)

He answered, “Haven’t you read in your Bible that the Creator originally made man and woman for each other, male and female? And because of this, a man leaves father and mother and is firmly bonded to his wife, becoming one flesh—no longer two bodies but one. Because God created this organic union of the two sexes, no one should desecrate his art by cutting them apart.”

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

"I had no intent of beating people in the head in the stick with this thread."

Is that what you think is happening here

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Why do you keep citing the most dogshit youth pastor in converse translations 

Anyway, that verse is about divorce retard 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I choked IRL at "haven't you read in your Bible".

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
ngl this is the first time I've ever seen The Message used unironically.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
>An entire essay by me about how Blister needs to have original thoughts
>Blister quotes a completely unrelated bible verse again to justify not having a brain (Worse, it's really stupid and apparently one of the worse translations.)
>I consider Mizal's suggestion to throw my prosthetic at the screen

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I have only read PK's response that I replied to and all these replies to my response since 11:30pm last night according to the time on this sight.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Like Daji said, there's nothing wrong with it in concept, but it's very much not a translation that should ever be used in one of these "every word of the Bible is the literal truth" debates lol.

Basically it's a lot of paraphrasing by a very nice man born in the 1930s who was trying to be the Steve Buscemi meme.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Bro is citing the Cocomelon Standard Bible. 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
This guy's mind is gonna be blown when he finds out there's LGBTQ Christians out there.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

If he's been reading my responses, he already knows and just hasn't processed the information yet.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

If homosexuality exists and your god exists, Blister, it is because your god put it or allowed it to be there. I am so sick of the cognitive dissonance on this issue. If homosexuality really is just a choice, my response to dudes who say that is PROVE IT and suck my dick. A classic one, of course. But they won't, because the thought disgusts them, which is exactly what gay people feel when thinking of doing heterosexual activity. Because it isn't just some perverted choice people randomly make one day.

Call it a mental disability if that makes you feel better, or a powerful little demon, whatever, but these aren't people just deciding to wallow in evil because they're just bad, vile little perverts. In fact every gay person I know is ten times the puritan than I am. Anecdotal evidence, of course, which holds little value. But the fact remains if gay is a choice, why don't the militant straights prove it by taking a shot in the mouth?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Ignore this crusty pervert.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
He means "every gay he knows" in the Biblical way.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Seconding this comment by RK (and too busy to write out my own text wall). Blister I'm glad you read this one, and I'm glad that you're taking breaks when participating in a traditional CYStian forum debate. It's a time-honored tradition cherished by the community, but it's good to pace yourself.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

You also have to consider that literally everyone is sinful and transgresses against God on the daily. Jesus ate with prostitutes and publicans (tax collectors who were pocketing the funds for themselves). He forgave thieves and criminals. Therefore, a Christian can find the humanity in a gay person and hang with them.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
My pastor brother would say this. It's a pretty Christian thing to say. If you can't love the gays you definitely don't know Jesus and will absolutely be one of the ones hearing, "Depart form me, worker of iniquity, I never knew you."

Unrelated: I saw a Muslim guy on Quora say being gay was a test from Allah, and that he felt honored by Allah for being thought of so highly to be given such a test. He claimed he must avoid all sexual relations for the duration of his life so as to not slip into gayness. All part of the test.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I've lost my token status? Curses! My schemes are ruined! (In all seriousness, belated welcome to the site and glad to have you here!)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

"I have at least five Christian friends who hate me"

"but they're still my friends"

I don't think you understand how friends work...

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I can see how that’d be confusing. They just hate the fact that I’m trans and gay, but they enjoy hanging out with me for other reasons.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Wait, you're a cock-sucking tranny? Nobody fucking told me. How many more of you are there, other than Darius, Petros, and malk?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

^^ brown guy 

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Wait, Cel's brown?!

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
He doesn't like to be reminded of it.

People who have seen his selfies have described him as "looking like the son of the guy who owns the kebab stand", take that how you will.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

lol, nigger

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
It's sandnigger, raghead, or kebab or something like that. Cel does not get invited to the bbq

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

I want barbeque

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Don't come to Arkansas. It's like Tennessee bbq and Texas bbq were combined into something that loses what made either of them special

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Since he's an Arab who believes in white supremacy, can I call him "race traitor?"

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
I still look forward to Malk's contributions to the debate on whether words have meanings.

But idea for new debate topic, maybe this one will be less challenging:

Blister should see if he can prove that cutting the testicles off of little boys is morally wrong.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
You just want to see me lose my mind again, don’t you? These balls are home grown, I’ll have you know. (It’s a prosthetic, not surgery.)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
No really, the until very recently historically common practice of castrating little boys, is it wrong? Or is it more of an ambiguous, personal act? We need to know what the NLT has to say.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago

Look, do you want opera composers to be able to write parts for male sopranos or not!?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
What about nipping the tip? I suppose the harmful effects aren't particularly bad, and as Mel Brooks said, "The ladies love it," but it's not like infants have the power to consent to getting the carrot chaffed. On the other hand it pleases God.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
Well the Bible has plenty to say about that (Jews are supposed to, but it was decided after much debate among early Christians to not be a necessary thing for Gentile converts to follow Mosaic Law yadda yadda) so it didn't serve the purpose of my question.

The Bible afaik has nothing at all to say about the practice of removing the testicles of young boys though. And this was a practice that went on long enough that we have an audio recording of one of the last castratos, and the last eunuch in China died in the 1990s.

I think most people today would be in agreement that this was a pretty bad thing to do, I mean I really question whether even an adult wanting to cut off their own parts is mentally sound enough to be ethically allowed to do so, but do Christians like Blister think so?

If so, he'd be forced to use his own thoughts to formulate words to explain why, which might actually be impossible for him. At any rate, this was one of the questions he preferred to ignore.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Do you get so mad when you see a thread like this you take them out and throw them at the screen?

Honestly, that could be a cool trick.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Guess I could, but I never thought to do it. Would be pretty funny, though.

Also funny when people see me without it for the first time, because it's at that point they realize I wasn't really a cis boy the whole time. (Or they think I have a micro-penis and have been stuffing my pants.)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
The only thing I've gleaned from this thread is that Blister is going to have the time of his life rebelliously experimenting in college.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

25 days ago
All I'll say is that I really wish Blister's suicide attempt was successful.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
My contribution to trying to help Blister develop his mind: read this letter on what happens if we try to take everything in the Bible literally:

https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~ss44/joke/laura.htm

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Well, this thread was quite a doozy to read. Philosophically speaking, I'm something of a neanderthal, but I thought I'd share an interesting verse that always gave me a lot to think about.

"For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." - Genesis 3:5

These were Satan's words to Eve when he was tempting her to eat the forbidden fruit from the tree in the Garden of Eden. Assuming his words were true, and with a bit of reverse logic, we can infer that God did not want humanity to have the ability to know of good and evil. This means that whenever we judge something or someone as good or evil, we might be committing the first, explicitly forbidden sin ourselves. I'm not saying I'd never call out someone for committing a sin, but I am only going to do it if I think it is worth committing a sin myself.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

"assuming his words were true" - amusing as one of Satan's names is 'the father of lies', and earlier on in the verse he literally contradicts God by saying 'you will not surely die'.

I don't think that's why God forbade eating the fruit. After all, how is one supposed to 'seek justice' or hold anyone to any form of societal values if we can't judge that what they have done is wrong? It's more likely the tree was there as a boundary allowing humans to actually choose to trust and obey God, thus exercising free will, or to rebel.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Once they ate the fruit, Adam and Eve became ashamed of being naked and covered their bodies. At the very least, it did have an effect on their psyche in the sense that they started seeing things in terms of good or evil. So that part at least was true.

As for the whole 'Seek justice' thing, I did mention that I would call people out and hold them accountable if the sins they commit were bad enough. Judge away if you feel you have to, but understand that you don't always have to. In the other cases, it's always better to advise than condemn.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Right, it says their eyes were opened and they were ashamed. They wanted to hide themselves from each other and also to hide from God. There's nothing evil about not having clothes of course so I think the stronger message there is a symbolic one. The Eden story the way I read it is about mankind losing the innocence of basically being intelligent animals and moving on to greater awareness of their actions.

Guilt is a part of that and so is blame--seems worth noting though that the first thing they did with that knowledge when confronted was to be weasely buck passers each pointing the finger at someone else when asked a simple yes/no question though lol.

But a few verses later it even confirms what happened there. "Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— therefore the Lord God sent him out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken.

It's interesting to me too that this is the story of mankind transitioning from a more carefree day by day existence to agriculture and animal husbandry and binding cities and all the problems of law and social structure they've been fucking up at ever since. It does a lot of heavy lifting for a pretty short and simple story.

But anyway back to your original point, there's also, "Judge not, lest ye be judged," and the parable of the unforgiving servant also in Matthew somewhere that are usually cited on this.


Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
"For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." - St. Matthew 7:2

It's actually another one of my favorite verses. :]

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

I agree with both your points. Particularly for that verse, if you judge someone it's only right you get judged the same way - being a hypocrite is never good.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
It could also be that Lucifer was the good guy all along, and perhaps a nice story-game can be written where you join the ultimate Freedom Fighter/Conspiracy theorist group, where the conspiracy is so deep that God Almighty orchestrated it and the rebellious Lucifer was really just someone who so strongly believed in Truth and Freedom he could not stand idly by, leading humanity out of the brainwashing bondage so that the true fight for freedom can begin.

Of course this would never work since God is slightly All-Mighty. Not unless you do something like that campy Lucifer TV show and have the fundamental problem be a lack of understanding of God's plan to help humanity—and even Lucifer—grow, rather than a conspiracy to manipulate and control lesser beings.

Too bad that's already been done. But I guess maybe it hasn't been done in a more serious way, other than those Sandman comics. But even that's probably not really scratching the surface of the narrative. Inb4 Paradise Lost.

Eh, I was interested for a second but I already did something similar in Fey Light so I will leave this to someone more talented.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Nobody's going to write this. You're going to be smug and say it was your idea

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I was toying with the fictional idea where all humans are actually fragments of a Defeated God. The Victorious God destroyed the Defeated God and then broke him into fragments (humans) in the hopes that when the fragments are reunited after being subjected to the whims of the material world, the Defeated God would be reborn as a being loyal to the Victorious God.

Of course, there are beings outside of "existence" as defined by the Victorious God who may want a different ending to the story. :]

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
This was the overarching plot of the "His Dark Materials" series.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
That's interesting. Didn't that get cancelled? If so I had planned to watch it and then decided not to so as to not get blue balls. Am I wrong on that?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago
The three seasons of the HBO series covers the entire original trilogy. The movie version only covers the first book and ends on a cliffhanger that will never be resolved in that format.

Also worth noting that the main thing my original comment was in response to was the idea of a God (the Authority) that was far from perfect and was being manipulated by organized religion (filling that Lucifer roll in your comment). If I recall there is a mention of angel-like beings being the foundation of that religion, but I may be misremembering that aspect.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago
Oh, so it's all there on HBO? In that case I'll probably check it out. I really hate being left hanging on a story, so I'll avoid the movie.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

That would be one thing if those were Satan's words, but there is no Capital S Satan of the Bible. The idea of a Satan was an abstraction and a teaching tool used by far later christians. The guy who told Eve to eat the apple was literally a snake, the reason he's there is part of the creation mythology to explain why snakes are like that and animals don't talk anymore. To presuppose that the snake was Satan would create flagrantly insane subtext, like God punishing an entire species of animals to squirm around on the ground because of something a sapient supernatural creature did while pretending to be one.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Capital S Satan is a prominent figure in Job which is one of the older books, although in a different kind of role then he'd get later on.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago
I have read that this could have been more of a job title in God's court, kinda like a prosecutor. Like God wanted someone there to present an opposing opinion, but I can't recall or find where I read it and I read some retarded heresy as an early teen

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Hey Blister!

What is the meaning of life? The universe? And everything?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

That's a silly question; Everyone knows it's 42.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Hey @Blister1 !

What are your thoughts on anime?

I promise that this connects with the thread discussion in an extremely relevant way and is not just a completely random question I pulled from the Ether...

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I mean, we already knew you're gay. What's the point of this demonstration?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

1. My bio should be enough evidence in of itself to disprove your gay claim.

2. I was just trying to bait Blister into saying he disapproves of anime cause its too lewd/satanic or whatever. I don't care one way or the other, I mainly just thought it would be funny... :/

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Better to accused of gay than to like anime and remove all doubt.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

This implies that liking anime is somehow worse than being gay... (If I'm reading what you said correctly that is...this really does come off like you rushed the wording of your sentence due to not being fully awake or something)

Not the kind of attitude I expected from a community that has "lol fag" as its default go to insult...but whatever I guess...

:/ :/ :/ :/

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Please do us all a favor and hang yourself, weeb.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
No no no, not worse at all. In fact no judgement is made. Rather it is an equivalence. Everyone likes anime, because in the immortal words of Kurt Cobain, "everyone is gay."

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Anime makes you gay.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

Oh really? This is news to me! :O

Explain...

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago

You should've seen WataNare last season or Watashi this season either one is peak Yuri

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Did you even read his post?

"Better to be accused of being gay than to like anime and remove all doubt (that you are gay)."

I assume most people who aren't brainless spastics (and even a few who are) also managed to recognize the reference meaning it really shouldn't need to be spelled out this way.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
I did deliberately leave off the "be" to make it more understandable to people who grew up on memes. Perhaps I erred in that choice.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

I didn't get the reference. Its not helped by the fact that I've never equated the idea of liking anime with being gay at any point in my entire life.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
If you're not familiar enough with Mark Twain to recognize the quote, then I'm sorry. I didn't realize I was mocking an illiterate downie weeb. Please remove the cock from your mouth (it can cause diseases) and crack open a copy of The Very Hungry Caterpillar. Work your way up from there.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
(It was attributed to Lincoln before Twain, but realistically it probably is by neither.)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Fucking fuck. Now I'm the fucking retard

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
I've seen it in a textbook listed as Twain's too, basically there's a ton of funny/sarcastic sayings from that period just sort of got glomped onto him.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

Read it, learn it, live it.

Blister could benefit too.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Gay is the more acceptable escape route, once you can no longer take interest in 3D women it's either prettyboy twinks or big breasted ten year olds with colored hair and no nose.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

So there's a difference then?

I feel like this contradicts what you said earlier... (Anime makes you gay)

One could argue its just two means to the same end, but I digress.

For the record, I totally get the watching anime equals autism/antisocial or incel/virgin or coomer stereotypes.

The gay one seems more of a stretch though by comparison, though I guess I can see how that leap is made a little bit better now that I had time to think about it! (lol :P)

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
She was clarifying flux's point earlier, retard. Try a print book fucktard

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

I think I understood what she said just fine.

Flux himself clarified that he didn't consider one to be better than the other (before he replied with his new post just now obviously).

Mizal obviously saw my other post and made a reply to me in general. If this was an attempt to say I was being stupid due to some dumb bs semantics, you have failed.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Me: "if you don't become gay then you turn into a weird pedophile" You: "Aha! Mizal, you contradict yourself!" Neither of those things are a vote for watching anime! You denying one is just admission of the other, and yes, one is much worse. Luckily, everyone here can see you are a huge faggot even if you cannot. And what is the last book you read?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

21 days ago

I love how he never answered this question.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
This was an attempt to say you're stupid due to being a dumb motherfucker online with dogged perseverance

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

Well, it starts like this: You see this young man from school one day. He is an adept warrior, with a natural talent for assassination.

And then for whatever reason, at some point he wears this outfit:

And then suddenly you find that you have become gay.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

You knowing this information outs you as well, no?

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
I think all his other posts outed him already.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Better to have been gay and lost, than to have never been gay at all.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Alien won't get this one either.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago
So true. Not all who wander are gay.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago
To gay or not to gay, that is the question.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago

"To thine own self be gay."

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago

Damn you hit upon a treasure trove, Anthraxus:

"All that glitters is not gay."

There are so many, I would be a glutton to post them all.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago

The daily quote thread is elsewhere.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

22 days ago
Fair.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Lol illiterate

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
Alien was the guy Abe was pointing at.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago
As it ws obviously the response you were looking for... "lol fag"

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

1.  How on earth is a bio any kind of authorative proof of anything?  "Look, I'm not (whatever), my bio says so."  This statement is complete retardery. Your assertion that it means anything proves you are a moron.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I didn't expect this thread to blow up during the night. Too bad my filter has kicked in and this thread is technically blocked due to inappropriate content. We might have to make a new thread if there are more questions like Alienrun's

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

You have a content filter on your computer? Oh, boy...

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Yes, for inappropriate content. includes cuss words, pictures, and topics like homosexuality and other "adult" themes that I'm trying to avoid. The questions from yesterday weren't too bad, but some of the stuff y'all said after I went to bed are questionable....

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

You're fu©king ret@rded. Stop living in the womb and face the real world.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I'm not saying it's a good thing, or a bad thing, but one thing I know is that Blister will never be able to talk to an Australian.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I would PM me if you have questions directed to me, looks like this thread is being used by tons of people to ask questions so it might be a little confusing

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Commended by Sherbet on 10/1/2025 3:27:54 PM

I'll see if I can get your dad to turn off the filter

Blister doesn't explain it at all

23 days ago

Does your filter block YouTube videos? You might love this classic:

Bearforce1

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Since this has become so contentious, here's the REAL Leviticus 18:22.



Interpret as you will.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago

Has never read the Bible.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
Later I'm going one by one to every thread on this forum to say FUCK SHIT CUNT so that this child's filters won't let him use it.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

24 days ago
I'm pretty sure someone will have naturally beat you to it in most of them, I honestly don't know how he's using the forum at all.

Blister doesn't explain it at all

21 days ago
I'll leave these links here, but don't ask me to explain anything, because I'm not gonna be on here other than to check book recommendations and to post a daily quote till I leave Tuesday to go to Mexico for a week.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KH6LLKw0Gk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JMF6hkOnmY&list=TLPQMDQxMDIwMjVy6viu6fMuKQ&index=2

Blister doesn't explain it at all

20 days ago
This has nothing to do with your parental filter.